We watched a comedian take AI chatbot comedy for a spin and it should alarm every American who cares about culture and work. This isn’t harmless tinkering in a lab — it’s an industrial-scale attempt to automate the jokes, kill the craft, and replace living writers with soulless, repeatable output. What Andrew Klavan and other creators are doing by holding these experiments up to the light is exactly the sort of wake-up call the public needs.
Artificial systems are already being fed sitcom formulas and spat back out with alarming fluency, producing scenes and punchlines that mimic human work while lacking real heart or responsibility. Hobbyists and startups alike are experimenting with AI-scripted sketches and entire sitcom premises, and some projects that stitch together old formats or fan-favorite tropes are gaining traction online.
Big Tech platforms are now being forced to reckon with the fallout because the volume of mass-produced, faceless content is drowning out genuine creators and gaming monetization rules. YouTube’s recent update targeting “inauthentic” or mass-produced videos shows the platform is trying — belatedly — to protect original human creators from being undercut by automated churn that adds no real value. That policy change proves the problem is not theoretical; it is a marketplace distortion that costs real livelihoods.
The technical creep goes beyond recycled jokes: AI voice cloning and synthetic media are resurrecting performers and erasing the labor angles that pay actors and writers. The line between tribute and theft is vanishing when studios can clone voices or synthesize performances, even if family consent is sometimes sought; the precedent is chilling for content creators trying to make a living. This technology has been used in high-profile projects to recreate deceased actors’ performances, and the ethical and economic consequences are only beginning to be felt.
Washington is paying attention because this isn’t just about entertainment — it’s about national culture, security, and property rights. The White House’s recent AI action plan pushes rapid adoption and infrastructure for AI while also promising guardrails; conservatives should insist those guardrails protect creators and free speech rather than empower censorship or enrichment of tech monopolies. The state has a role in preventing fraud and abuse of synthetic media without handing Big Tech a license to monetize cultural theft.
Conservatives must draw a bright line: innovation is good, but lawless automation that hollows out American culture and jobs is not. We can cheer on tools that help a writer polish a joke, but we must oppose a system that turns every TV room and comedy writer out of work so venture capitalists can mint cheap clicks. Citizens and lawmakers should demand transparency, consent, and compensation whenever AI stands to replace or imitate a human creator’s work.
If we want comedy, film, and television that uplift and reflect lived American experience, we need to defend the people who make it. That means lobbying platforms to enforce authenticity standards, pressing Congress to clarify intellectual-property rules for synthetic media, and supporting outlets that pay real writers and performers. This fight is simple: protect honest work, punish bad actors, and refuse to let a handful of Silicon Valley suits decide what gets labeled “entertainment” for the rest of us.
Hardworking creators are not nostalgia; they are the engines of our storytelling economy, and they deserve a society that honors their craft. Americans who love free markets should demand markets where talent, not automation factories, wins the day. Stand with the writers, stand with the actors, and stand against the hollowing out of our culture by unaccountable machines.

