Three days ago, a shocking incident unfolded as a brazen attempt was made on the life of former President Donald Trump. The details that have emerged since then have raised concerns and suspicions among many, with various narratives unfolding.
Reports indicate that snipers were positioned within the building where the assailant had taken position, as confirmed by insiders. Eyewitnesses remember seeing the gunman perched on a nearby building just before chaos broke loose. Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) shared his perspective on the situation in a recent interview, hinting at the possibility of a setup, a viewpoint that seemed to ruffle some feathers at CNN.
WATCH: CNN Anchor Loses It After Cory Mills Suggests Trump Attack Could Have Been 'Setup' https://t.co/pK7Rw9gxU2
— 🇺🇸BamaFan 🐘🏈 (@clark6271) July 17, 2024
Rep. Mills, drawing on his military background, criticized the security arrangements at the event, particularly highlighting the neighboring building’s vantage point as being ideal for a sniper. He expressed frustrations over what he perceived as negligence or possibly even intentional oversight in ensuring the safety of the former president.
The investigation took a new turn as the FBI delved into the actions of a local officer present at the scene. Reports suggested that the officer hesitated in confronting the would-be assassin, opting to retreat after the assailant pointed a rifle in their direction. This turn of events has stirred discontent among law enforcement circles, with questions lingering about the officer’s handling of the situation.
As details continue to surface, the incident has sparked debates and raised questions about the security protocols in place during public events involving high-profile figures. The aftermath of the attempted attack has left many wondering about the potential implications and lessons to be learned moving forward.