Staff Reports
Joe Biden had a major meltdown when a reporter, Peter Doocy from Fox News, had the audacity to ask him about his involvement in his family’s shady business deals. Biden lashed out, calling Doocy’s question a “lousy” one and claiming that he never talked business with anyone. But the evidence tells a different story.
Devon Archer, who recently testified before the House, revealed that Biden was “the brand” that his son, Hunter, was selling abroad. Biden reportedly had numerous phone calls with Hunter’s foreign business partners and even attended dinners with his son’s sketchy associates. Archer stated that Biden provided crucial “defensive leverage” for the Ukrainian company Burisma Holdings, which paid Hunter a hefty salary for access to the Biden “brand.” But of course, Biden and his allies in the Democratic Party and the media have conveniently ignored these damning allegations.
In an attempt to cover up his involvement, Biden and his cronies have twisted Archer’s words and falsely claimed that he only discussed trivial matters in his conversations with Hunter’s partners. Democrat Dan Goldman even lied to the public by misrepresenting Archer’s use of the phrase “illusion of access.” Archer actually admitted that Hunter was not overt about selling influence, but the mere appearance of access was valuable to Burisma. He even boldly stated that the company would have gone out of business without the Biden “brand.''
🚨Peter Doocy confronts Biden about his involvement w/Hunter’s foreign bribe deals after Devon Archer testified Joe was on at least 20+ calls to lock in the bribes
Joe doubled down saying he was never involved & that it was a “lousy question”
Then he ran like a coward! pic.twitter.com/MKZgpwLEgU
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) August 9, 2023
While the White House and the Biden administration continue to deny any wrongdoing, they have been forced to backtrack on their previous claims. Initially, they insisted that Biden had no knowledge of his son’s business dealings, but now they say that Biden was never actively in business with him. It’s a feeble attempt to distance Biden from the controversy, but as Archer pointed out, it’s categorically false to say that Biden had no role in his son’s business. The evidence is mounting against Biden, and his inability to answer Doocy’s question speaks volumes. It’s clear that he cannot handle even the slightest scrutiny after being shielded by the media for so long.
