adminThey tell us we’re the problem while they run the playbook of censorship and double standards, and the Matt Walsh saga is proof. Walsh’s film What Is a Woman? put a mirror up to the questions the establishment refuses to ask, and it sparked the predictable outrage from the cultural class that thinks it owns truth and manners.
When a commercial platform like Eventbrite quietly yanks screening pages and pretends it’s defending safety, that’s not fairness — it’s selective silencing. The company removed listings for watch parties of Walsh’s film while allowing other ideologically favored events to flourish, an obvious example of corporate gatekeepers deciding which viewpoints get public space.
Big Tech tried the same thing on a larger scale, demonetizing Walsh’s channel after his relentless pushback against the trans activist-industrial complex and the Dylan Mulvaney spectacle. YouTube’s move only proved the point: the tech giants are arbitrators of acceptable speech, and when conservatives push back the way Walsh did, they’re punished — so he took his show where he could keep fighting.
Even the left’s media allies couldn’t contain the Streisand effect when Twitter’s owner stepped in and amplified the documentary instead of letting it be buried. Elon Musk’s decision to promote the film showed that when the opposition tries to cancel something, the backlash often spreads the message farther than any paid ad ever could.
Yes, Walsh has been accused of baiting interviewees through what critics call the Gender Unity Project, and activists loudly cried foul when confronted on camera — but notice how quickly the howl becomes a demand for censorship rather than an argument. If the left prefers safe spaces over answers, they have no business lecturing Americans about debate; free speech looks messy, and that’s by design.
Of course the outrage brigade is selective: when Walsh defends unpopular speech or even points out the witch-hunt against voices like VDARE, the same pundits who squeal about “hate” suddenly morph into arbiters of who deserves mercy. And when he pushed back against the cancel culture treatment of a polarizing figure like Shiloh Hendrix, conservatives who still value standing up to mob justice rallied while critics painted it as endorsement of ugliness instead of defense of principle. The point is simple — the left’s moralizing is transactional and hypocritical.
Hardworking Americans aren’t here to grovel to a sanctimonious elite that confuses popularity with righteousness. We don’t owe the hypocrites in media, in boardrooms, or in Big Tech our silence, our money, or our respect when they’re the ones rewriting the rules to protect their favorite tribes. Stand up, watch the questions being asked, and refuse to let virtue-signaling bureaucrats and cancel mobs decide what counts as common sense for the rest of us.
