admin
The Clintons finally answered questions under oath this week about their ties to Jeffrey Epstein, sitting for closed-door depositions that were forced only after Republicans threatened contempt. Both Bill and Hillary told the House Oversight Committee they had no knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and insisted their contacts with him were limited or non-existent. Americans deserved this moment of accountability after a decade of evasions, and the spectacle confirmed that no one — however well-connected — should be above scrutiny.
The proceedings were immediately roiled by a leaked photo of Hillary taken inside the deposition room, a breach that stopped the session and exposed the lengths to which Establishment operatives will go to control narrative and process. Conservative figures quickly amplified the image, arguing that any slip of secrecy is a gift to the public hungry for truth; Democrats called the leak an illegal stunt meant to intimidate. Whether you applaud the exposure or condemn the rule-breaking, the leak underscored one reality: secrecy breeds suspicion, and secrecy in elite circles must be fought.
Bill Clinton’s testimony leaned on the familiar refrain of “I don’t recall” and the insistence that twenty-year-old photos don’t change what he claims he knew — a line that sounded rehearsed and convenient. Yet Justice Department-released files show images placing Clinton in social proximity to Epstein and to Ghislaine Maxwell, and those visuals demand straightforward answers, not evasions. Patriots who cherish the rule of law should not accept memory lapses from the powerful as a defense when evidence exists that needs explanation.
Republican investigators are right to press hard and seek public hearings after these closed-door sessions, because the American people deserve transparency about who in our national elite enjoyed access to Epstein. This isn’t about cheap partisan points; it’s about whether powerful networks enabled predators and whether political influence obstructed justice. If Democrats truly believe their leaders are innocent, they should welcome open scrutiny instead of sneering about “fishing expeditions.”
Hillary Clinton’s claim that she “never met Jeffrey Epstein” while acknowledging casual acquaintance with Maxwell will not satisfy people who remember how often prominent figures once skated past accountability. Her sharp attack on the committee as a partisan exercise rings hollow when contrasted with her refusal to take the same transparency demands she applies to others. Voters who work and play by the rules are tired of elites applying different standards to themselves.
Now is the moment for conservatives to keep the pressure on for full release of records, public testimony, and accountability where it’s due, all while defending due process and lawful procedure. We should demand that any photographs, flight logs, and sworn statements be put where the public can see them and let the facts — not influence and cover-ups — decide the story. America’s trust in institutions won’t be rebuilt by soft excuses; it will be rebuilt by relentless pursuit of truth and equal application of the law.
