Staff Reports
A recent revelation from the Justice Department has turned more heads than a conservative at a progressive rally. Ryan Wesley Routh, the man alleged to have attempted an assassination on Donald Trump, apparently had so much to say before his nefarious plot that he decided to scribble it down in a letter that could double as a cautionary tale for the easily impressionable. This discovery, presented by what some might dub the “Department of Justice,” paints a vivid picture of a criminally-inclined Democrat donor on a mission of misguided moral outrage.
The saga took a dark twist when a witness turned over a box dropped off by Routh, which contained a motley collection of items, including ammunition and tools—as if he were preparing for some sort of demented handyman project rather than a premeditated attack on a former president. The real kicker emerged from his handwritten letter, addressed ominously to “Dear World,” in which Routh “apologized” for failing to complete his mission, promising a reward for anyone brave enough to take over where he left off. This makes one wonder if Routh missed the memo that political discourse does not typically involve assassination attempts—at least not in polite society.
Shooting suspect left behind disturbing anti-Trump letter: 'This was an assassination attempt' https://t.co/TXMV5OUvqP pic.twitter.com/DO5LCY70QX
— Jeffrey Levin 🇺🇦 (@jilevin) September 23, 2024
Routh’s musings reveal not just a fixation on Trump but also a significant misunderstanding of who the real threat to humanity might be. He claimed that the former president is “unfit” to serve, yet missed the irony of his own actions in expressing such disdain. After all, it takes a certain level of cognitive dissonance to argue about the moral fabric of the presidency while simultaneously plotting murder. While Routh laments Trump’s foreign policy decisions regarding Iran, one can’t help but wonder if a little introspection about his own actions might have been more appropriate.
His self-published tome might actually win the award for cringiest title ever—“Ukraine’s Unwinnable War: The Fatal Flaw of Democracy, World Abandonment, and the Global Citizen.” Yes, that’s right. Apparently, Routh isn’t merely a wannabe assassin but also an amateur geopolitical analyst, although his conclusions read more like the ramblings of someone who failed Psychology 101. In a clarification that leaves little to the imagination, he even gives Iran a nod of approval for executing Trump and himself—a recommendation fitting for a man who believes himself so deeply misunderstood.
As the wheels of justice begin to turn, what remains to be seen is just how thoroughly Routh premeditated this act of violence. The timing of his letters, written months before his September attempt, raises eyebrows. Was he scouting out Trump’s golf course, plotting like an underwhelming villain from a B-list action movie? One could assume that careful planning was involved, yet it appears Routh merely gave a half-hearted attempt at achieving infamy while failing to carve out any real repercussions for his actions—or any life choices leading up to them, for that matter.
As the story continues to unfold, it seems Routh has only made himself a poster child for the perils of radical rhetoric. His failure to achieve his goal only highlights a greater issue within the left, one that appears disillusioned by democracy and determined to eliminate dissenting views through drastic—albeit misguided—methods. As the country watches this bizarre tale unfold, it’s crucial to remember that not every ideological opponent needs to be silenced by violence; sometimes, they can simply be outvoted at the polls.
