admin
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas strode into NATO HQ with the urgency of someone who has lived under Soviet shadow and refuses to pretend the threat is distant. In a blunt conversation captured by Newsmax, she warned that Russia’s aggression is not a short blip but a long-term strategy of sabotage, cyberattacks, and military buildup that European capitals can no longer ignore. Her stark candor should jolt any American who still thinks Europe can muddle along without serious defense spending.
Kallas also made clear that any back‑channel deal between Washington and Moscow that leaves Kyiv out of the room would be a betrayal of European security and international law. She insisted that the EU and Ukraine must have a seat at the table if talks are to have any legitimacy — a sensible demand that exposes the danger of secret bargains that trade away others’ sovereignty. That warning came as leaders prepared for high‑level meetings between Washington and Moscow, and it ought to remind U.S. policymakers that strength and principle must go together.
Conservative patriots should welcome the parts of Kallas’s message that push Europeans to be less dependent on American muscle. She publicly called President Trump’s pressure on NATO to raise defense spending “tough love,” and she was right to: good for the president for forcing a conversation Europe long ducked. America cannot be the world’s ATM while allies enjoy the security umbrella on the cheap; demanding fair burden‑sharing is both fiscally responsible and strategically sound.
At the same time, there’s no excuse for naive surrender to Putin’s revisionism. Kallas has repeatedly sounded the alarm about Russian intent — from airspace violations to attacks on critical infrastructure — and her arguments underscore the need for deterrence, not appeasement. If European leaders finally step up and spend on real defense, the West will be far better positioned to hold the line without endless American taxpayer bailouts.
Some in Washington talk like peace means turning off the spigot and walking away; others treat diplomacy as a free pass to cut deals that abandon allies. Kallas’s blunt demand that Ukraine be part of any agreement is a rebuke to that cynical calculus and a reminder that true peace must preserve sovereignty, not reward aggression. Hard‑headed conservatives know that negotiations without leverage are worthless — and that leverage starts with a robust U.S. posture and NATO unity.
Let’s be honest: Europe’s bureaucrats have been slow to translate rhetoric into capability, and that failure has real consequences for American security interests. Kallas deserves credit for pushing the EU toward a harder line, but words without budgets mean little when a revisionist Russia is rearming on an industrial scale. If Brussels wants credibility, it will match Kallas’s warnings with defense plans, munitions production, and border defenses — not platitudes.
America should lead with strength and principle: back Ukraine’s right to choose its future, insist that any negotiations include those most affected, and demand that NATO members pay their fair share. That approach protects both European freedom and American taxpayers, advances peace through strength, and denies Putin the spoils of conquest. Hardworking Americans deserve a foreign policy that secures victory without sacrificing our interests or our values.
