Staff Reports
In a surprising turn of events, a well-known anti-gun group called Everytown for Gun Safety has recently announced a new initiative aimed at teaching law-abiding citizens about responsible gun ownership. This program is named “Train Smart,” and it has sparked serious skepticism among gun rights advocates. Critics are particularly wary of the motives behind a group that has historically pushed for extensive gun control measures, including bans on popular firearms and strict regulations affecting lawful gun owners.
The Train Smart initiative boasts various courses designed to educate potential gun owners about firearm safety. One course is a one-hour session titled “Smart Guide to Buying a Gun,” which aims to present facts about gun ownership without the pressure of a sales pitch. Another component is a more in-depth, two-and-a-half-hour class on responsible firearm ownership, conducted by instructors whose qualifications and intentions are unclear. Given Everytown’s past lobbying efforts against certain types of firearms, it raises eyebrows when they claim to be the experts in gun safety.
One aspect of the program that is particularly concerning is the push for increased regulation through classes that encourage the need for permits and licenses. This contrasts sharply with the movement towards constitutional carry, which promotes the idea that law-abiding citizens should have the freedom to carry firearms without extensive governmental interference. Ironically, this push for regulatory measures comes from a group that has previously opposed certification programs from established organizations, such as the National Rifle Association.
Adding to the confusion is the upcoming eight-hour class on gun safety and marksmanship. This class will cover various topics, including suicide prevention and de-escalation tactics. However, it remains unclear whether participants will have the opportunity for practical experience or range time in a controlled environment. Many gun owners are left wondering which reputable firearm instructors or ranges would be willing to collaborate with a group known for undermining Second Amendment rights.
The realization that an organization with fundamentally opposing views on gun rights is suddenly positioning itself as a safety authority is troubling for many enthusiasts. Responsible gun ownership is typically taught by trusted local firearms dealers and certified instructors who prioritize legal education and hands-on training. This grassroots approach builds relationships based on trust and shared values, something likely absent from training provided by a group seeking to limit gun ownership.
In concluding the discussion around Everytown’s initiative, it is essential for gun owners and advocates of the Second Amendment to remain vigilant and informed. Recognizing the underlying motivations of any organization offering training is crucial. The message is clear: individuals should prioritize education from local and reputable sources over potentially biased programs that may serve a broader political agenda. Upholding Second Amendment rights requires not just awareness, but active participation in safeguarding freedoms against deceptive practices and regulations. The future of gun rights in America depends on dedicated citizens who are informed, responsible, and steadfast in their commitment to freedom.
