admin
Glenn Beck has been laying out on his chalkboard what many hardworking Americans have suspected: there are organized money flows and networks behind the chaos we see in our streets, not just anonymous kids in masks. Beck walks viewers through the web of foundations, pass-through nonprofits, and advocacy groups that, he argues, act as the plumbing for radical street movements and civil unrest.
A new watchdog report escalates that concern by arguing that George Soros’s Open Society Foundations has funneled tens of millions to groups linked to violent direct actions and radical street campaigns. Conservatives should pay attention when a long chain of grants points toward organizations that endorse confrontational tactics and then turn up at the center of mayhem.
Beyond billionaire-funded foundations, the Tides network and its affiliates have repeatedly come under scrutiny for serving as fiscal conduits that move government and private money into activist spaces. Investigations document millions in State Department and USAID awards routed through Tides-linked entities that later supported on-the-ground protest infrastructure and legal-defense networks.
Those legal-defense and bail networks are not abstract; they provide immediate, practical support to arrested rioters and organizers, and some of them are administered through fiscally sponsored hubs tied to the Tides Center. That kind of logistical support turns spontaneous disorder into organized campaigns that repeatedly target American cities and police—something citizens and taxpayers should not shrug off.
At the same time, sober fact-checkers have warned there is no clean paper trail proving a direct dollar-for-dollar relationship between Soros paying a named “Antifa” organization to do violence on U.S. streets. Responsible reporting requires acknowledging that donors fund advocacy and civil-society work, while critics document how some grantees end up enabling disruptive actions. Conservatives should use both sets of information—the documented funding and the gaps in direct proof—to press for transparency, not to cede the field to vague smears.
The federal government has begun to respond to these revelations with inquiries and directives aimed at rooting out networks that allegedly support political violence, and the Open Society Foundations has publicly denied funding illegal activity. Whether those probes are politically motivated or necessary oversight depends on whether investigators follow the money and the facts without partisan blinders.
Patriots who love law, order, and free speech should demand independent audits, enforcement of existing laws against material support for violence, and an end to the backroom funding that hides who is bankrolling chaos. If the left insists on weaponizing nonprofit status and federal grants to bankroll unrest, conservatives must fight relentlessly for transparency, accountability, and the safety of American communities.
