admin
Americans woke up to news that the FBI has moved to interview six Democratic lawmakers after they released a video urging members of the U.S. military to “refuse illegal orders,” a development that should alarm every patriot who believes civilian control must be nonpartisan and lawful. This is not a garden-variety political dust-up — federal agents are now involved, and that raises real questions about who authorized this message and why it was framed in such a provocative way.
The lawmakers in the video include Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly and Representatives Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan — all of whom emphasize their service backgrounds while telling troops they can reject unlawful directives. Whether you agree with their legal reading or not, the optics of six former service members broadcasting a political judgment to active-duty personnel is dangerous and unprecedented in modern congressional practice.
The controversy escalated when the Pentagon announced a review of Sen. Mark Kelly and whether his remarks crossed into conduct that undermines military discipline, with officials even discussing the narrow, but serious, option of recalling him to address alleged violations of military rules. If anybody believes our armed forces should be dragged into partisan messaging with potential disciplinary consequences, they should think twice — the chain of command and cohesion of our forces cannot survive being weaponized for political theater.
President Trump and others immediately labeled the video “seditious,” and the president’s fiery reaction drew national attention and more questions about the limits of political speech versus actions that might encourage insubordination. The FBI’s outreach to the lawmakers signals that federal authorities are treating the matter as more than an inside-the-Beltway squabble, and that should prompt a sober, careful probe rather than partisan hand-wringing.
Legal scholars have already weighed in, and many say the video’s content — reminding troops they must follow lawful orders — is a restatement of established law rather than a call to overthrow the government, which makes the legal characterization contested and the FBI’s interest politically fraught. That legal ambiguity is precisely why a full, transparent investigation is essential: Americans deserve to know whether officials were simply telling the truth about military law or whether this was a coordinated message meant to sow confusion inside the ranks.
Conservatives should not reflexively cheer investigations into opponents, but neither should we tolerate elite double standards where political allies get a pass while conservative voices face relentless scrutiny. There must be accountability on both sides: if Democratic lawmakers crossed legal or ethical lines, they should face consequences; if federal agencies are being used as political cudgels, that abuse must be exposed and ended immediately.
We also need to examine who produced and promoted the video. Was this a grassroots appeal from concerned veterans, or a coordinated operation from power players in the national security community pushing a partisan line under the cover of service? The American people and their service members deserve answers — and anyone who used their military credentials to politicize the chain of command should explain themselves in public.
At the end of the day, conservatives believe in strong, disciplined armed forces loyal to the Constitution, not to a political faction. Investigations should be prompt, impartial, and transparent so that we can protect our troops from politicization while defending free speech and the rule of law. Patriots on every side should demand no less.
