Staff Reports
Former Republican Attorney General Curtis Hill of Indiana, who also happens to be running for Governor, is demanding that Indiana Republican Senator Mike Braun provide clarity regarding his past support for the Black Lives Matter movement and calls to repeal qualified immunity. For Hill, it’s crucial to understand where Braun stands on these important issues.
Braun recently unveiled his public safety plan, which prioritizes the safety of communities, supports law enforcement, secures the southern border, strengthens the criminal justice system, addresses the drug crisis, ensures school safety, and protects qualified immunity. But let’s not forget that Braun’s plan also raises eyebrows due to his previous support for Black Lives Matter and his efforts to scale back qualified immunity.
🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨Former Indiana Attorney General Demands Clarity From Sen. Mike Braun On Qualified Immunity, BLM Support from @henryrodgersdc https://t.co/wh9JjmaEmh
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) February 16, 2024
During a June 2020 interview with Tucker Carlson, Braun was questioned about his endorsement of the BLM movement and his bill to reform qualified immunity. When asked by Carlson if he supports the BLM movement, Braun responded that he does because it addresses lingering inequities. However, his stance was met with further scrutiny from Carlson, who criticized Braun’s bill to limit qualified immunity.
Braun’s new public safety plan now claims that qualified immunity is a “crucial legal doctrine” that shields officers from personal responsibility while on duty. He argues that officers must have the confidence and legal safeguards necessary to make decisions in the interest of public safety. It seems Braun’s position on qualified immunity has undergone a significant shift.
Hill wasted no time in criticizing Braun and his past support for Black Lives Matter, along with his statements opposing qualified immunity. Hill believes that Braun’s support for BLM and his previous positions on qualified immunity raise legitimate concerns for Hoosiers. He asserts that Braun must clarify his stance on these issues if he wants to earn the trust of the people. Hill emphasizes that Hoosiers need a leader who governs as a conservative, rather than someone who only campaigns as one.
It’s worth noting that the National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) has also called out Braun, urging him to clarify his public statements regarding their supposed support for his Qualified Immunity bill. The FOP took to Twitter to express their non-support for the legislation, adding another layer of complexity to Braun’s position.
As the gubernatorial primary approaches on May 7, 2024, Braun enjoys the endorsement of former President Donald Trump. However, with mounting questions regarding his past statements and shifting positions, it remains to be seen if Braun can effectively address the concerns of Hoosiers who value conservative leadership and law enforcement support.
In this case, Hill’s demand for clarity from Braun is justifiable. The people of Indiana deserve a candidate who aligns with their conservative values and exhibits unwavering support for law enforcement. Braun may have the backing of Trump, but if he fails to address these issues adequately, it could jeopardize his chances of winning the primary and ultimately the governor’s office.
