Staff Reports
The House Oversight Committee has taken a bold leap into the murky waters of national security by launching an investigation into Tim Walz, the vice presidential candidate who has a rather alarming affinity for China. Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer from Kentucky isn’t holding back, expressing fears that if Walz were to ascend to the highest office next year alongside Kamala Harris, his extensive relationships with the Chinese might serve as more than just a honeymoon souvenir.
According to Walz’s own estimation, he has traveled to China about 30 times, including a romantic getaway with his wife. It raises a pertinent question: what kind of foreign policy are we looking at if Walz ends up holding the second-in-command position? In a letter to the FBI Director, Comer urged thorough investigations into all of Walz’s interactions with Chinese Communist Party-linked figures, indicating that a little scrutiny is long overdue.
🚨🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Jim Banks has called on the Pentagon to launch an immediate investigation into Tim Walz’s repeated visits to China during his time with the Minnesota National Guards. pic.twitter.com/gK7tu0Ev3p
— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) August 15, 2024
Comer also pointed to a particularly concerning instance from Walz’s past — a trip he organized as a teacher for students, reportedly funded by the Chinese government. This embroidery of ties, stitched together over decades of visits and interactions with a regime known for its nefarious methods, could offer a chilling glimpse of Walz’s true stance on foreign affairs, particularly concerning Beijing’s aggressive maneuvers on the global stage.
Republicans have seized on Walz’s history like a dog with a bone, questioning whether his Chinese escapades have influenced his policies at home. The evidence raises eyebrows, leading some GOP lawmakers to speculate wildly about what a ‘Harris-Walz’ administration might mean for U.S.-China relations. The insinuation is loud and clear: can someone with such deep ties to an adversarial regime be trusted to defend American interests? Representative Mark Green has even suggested that if the Harris-Walz campaign were more transparent, perhaps they could clear up these nagging doubts.
Meanwhile, the Walz campaign quickly deflected criticism, showcasing his public condemnation of China’s human rights violations as evidence of his American loyalties. This may sound convincing on paper, but past statements raise the specter of a man who has romanticized China’s potential under what he called “proper leadership,” which sounds alarmingly like soft-gloving the hammer and sickle.
Comer has made it clear he expects the FBI to provide the necessary materials for this investigation, though it remains to be seen if the agency will cooperate. One thing is crystal clear: with the constant threat of foreign interference looming large, the American public has a right to know just how profoundly connected their potential vice president is to one of the most problematic governments on the planet.
