Staff Reports
Hunter Biden, the son of the current president, continues to wade through a swamp of legal troubles, yet somehow manages to find a shallow puddle to paddle in. Recently, he pleaded guilty to nine federal tax charges, but if you think this is the end, then the Biden playbook must be your bedtime reading material. Just when it seemed like his legal issues were piling up like dirty laundry, a judge came to his rescue by dismissing a civil defamation case against him. After all, what’s a little tax evasion in light of some victorious courtroom antics?
The defamation suit was registered by John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware. Isaac became the unwitting custodian of Biden’s abandoned laptop, which was left for repair but never fetched, much like Hunter’s sense of responsibility. When Isaac examined the contents of that now-infamous device, he discovered a treasure trove of evidence that would make any proud liberal clutch their pearls—drug use, illegal firearms, and images that would give parents nightmares. The New York Post famously exposed this digital trove during the 2020 election season, prompting 51 former intelligence officials to insist it was all a big Russian operation, because apparently, everything bad in the world can be traced back to Putin.
A computer repairman at the center of the Hunter Biden laptop story has lost his defamation case against several news outlets, Hunter Biden, and Biden’s campaign. Counterclaims from Hunter accusing the repairman of invasion of privacy were also dismissed.https://t.co/zddvg9i3WL
— Badlands Media (@BadlandsMedia_) October 2, 2024
As part of his legal battleground, Isaac alleged that Biden defamed him by implying he was involved in some nefarious plot rather than owning up to abandoning his laptop. Biden’s defense, however, was as slick as a political spin—asserting that he never mentioned Isaac by name. Superior Court Judge Robert Robinson Jr. agreed with this fairly convenient line of reasoning, leaving Isaac back where he started, without his laptop and slightly more cynical about the justice system.
Isaac’s attorney, Ronald Poliquin, wasn’t about to back down without a fight. He argued that Biden had deceived the American public through a public performance on national television. Apparently, the truth is a strange concept when it conflicts with political narrative, and Poliquin is gearing up to appeal the judge’s ruling. His contention is that accountability is critical, especially when one party has the gall to throw around terms like “Russian conspiracy” like family secrets at Thanksgiving dinner.
Meanwhile, Hunter continues to juggle his legal woes like a circus performer; he is set to be sentenced in December for an array of gun charges. In a desperate plea for pity, Biden tried to paint his guilty plea for tax offenses as an act of selflessness—all to spare his family further persecution. So, while one courtroom battle may have been won, the war of accountability continues as Hunter Biden serves as a living testament to the idea that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, especially when that tree is tangled in a web of questionable ethics and legal troubles.
