Staff Reports
Rep. Jim Jordan’s recent foray into investigating the murky depths of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has unearthed some juicy details that further reinforce the notion that her prosecution of former President Donald Trump might be more about personal ambition than actual justice. The unveiling of Nathan Wade, Willis’ former special prosecutor and current object of scrutiny, offers an eyebrow-raising glimpse into the circus that is this politically motivated legal saga.
Wade’s reluctance to cooperate with congressional investigators was evident long before he finally showed up for his closed-door deposition. Reports indicated that he went AWOL when officials attempted to serve him with a summons—an act that raises questions about what he was trying to hide. When he did finally face the music, the interactions between him and the House Judiciary Committee were more akin to a game of verbal dodgeball, with Wade employing frequent memory lapses and vague defenses, while investigators attempted to glean meaningful information.
Fani Willis’s LOVER Nathan Wade, has ADMITTED to meetings with the White House.
Which means:
HE VERY LIKELY COLLUDED WITH THE WHITE HOUSE TO TAKE DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP. THIS IS ILLEGAL. pic.twitter.com/kCnBeJFTOz
— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) October 22, 2024
The deposition transcript revealed that Wade had met with officials from the White House, including the Counsel’s office, as they dug into Trump’s supposed attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. This aspect of the inquiry bears watching, especially considering the timeline of events leading up to Willis launching her politically charged investigation. It seems the motivation may have been brewing long before she took office.
Wade’s explanation during the deposition took a comically convoluted twist when pressed about an invoice referencing a meeting with White House counsel. His defense hingeing on a semicolon was particularly telling, showcasing a level of evasion that would make any seasoned politician proud. Despite the attempts to pull specifics from him, Wade’s frequent use of phrases like “I can’t recall” became a running theme, prompting skepticism and further inquiries into his role in the proceedings.
The real headline here revolves around the timeline provided by Wade, which indicates that Fani Willis was apparently plotting her legal attack on Trump long before she even assumed her role as district attorney. The timing suggests that this crusade was more about bolstering her reputation within Democrat circles than about prosecuting any alleged wrongdoing. It raises significant concerns about whether taxpayers are footing the bill for a politically charged vendetta disguised as legal proceedings.
The antics of Wade and Willis serve as a glaring example of how power can often lead to questionable motives and ethical quandaries. The ongoing saga appears to be much more than a simple legal dispute; rather, it highlights a dangerous mix of political ambition and personal interests. If Republicans remain in control of the House, there is a glimmer of hope that further investigation might unravel the layers of deception surrounding this power-hungry duo. The implications of their actions could have far-reaching consequences for justice and accountability in America.
