Staff Reports
The latest episode in the ongoing saga of political espionage has once again put a spotlight on the left’s back-alley tactics. Over the weekend, the Trump campaign fell victim to a hack that, surprise surprise, has specific fingerprints resembling those of Iranian malfeasance. In a twist that could only be penned by Hollywood, Politico and the Washington Post reported that they received confidential memos from a petty hacker calling himself “Robert,” along with a treasure trove of publicly available information about Trump’s intended running mate, Senator J.D. Vance of Ohio. Just what the world needed: a 271-page vetting dossier delivered by AOL, the preferred email service of 1999.
Microsoft cocked its head this past Friday and identified a spear phishing incident directed at a “high-ranking official” in an unnamed presidential campaign. With the mystery unfolding like a cheap detective novel, it eventually became clear that it was indeed Trump’s campaign that had been compromised. Leftists tend to think they are clever, but when your “top secret” intelligence comes from an email address that screams “I’m a 90s throwback,” it’s not exactly comforting.
As news of the Trump 2024 Campaign hacking breaks, here’s an explanation of what happened, who the hackers were and how they succeeded.https://t.co/X4dyAwSKPJ pic.twitter.com/z8CD11wDC6
— Forbes Tech (@ForbesTech) August 11, 2024
In a delightful bit of irony, it turns out the Democrats also found themselves in a similar mess. The Biden-Harris campaign, after Biden’s decision to take a permanent vacation from the presidential race, received those oh-so-convincing spear phishing emails, too. Thankfully, their tech whizzes managed to dodge the bullets—at least for now. Harris’s camp snitched to the FBI, claiming they were the targets of a foreign influence operation. At the same time, the FBI has unveiled an investigation into both Trump and Biden’s vulnerabilities. Perhaps they should have invested in better passwords instead of relying on government overreach to safeguard their sensitive information.
In true Trump fashion, the former president pointed fingers directly at Iran, declaring that the cyber-knock on his campaign was not just cheeky but downright pathetic. He took to Truth Social, channeling his inner tough guy to drop some truth bombs about weak governance leading to foreign solid predation. The ex-president believes he possesses the nuclear option for global diplomacy and, perhaps, the hammer to wield against global mischief makers like Iran.
In a statement, a spokesman for the Trump campaign echoed the well-rehearsed lines of foreign actors attempting to meddle in the 2024 elections. Apparently, these hackers are somehow able to sift through public information and concoct chaos out of thin air. Meanwhile, the media outlets that received all this tantalizing information played it safe and chose to report on the hack itself instead of the content of the memos. This strategic decision likely came from the realization that there isn’t much left to explore in Trump’s public record. After all, his brand of charisma is well-known, even if some would prefer to bury it under layers of misinformation.
As the FBI probe progresses, one can’t help but draw parallels to the earlier incidences of political hacking in 2016, where the now-infamous WikiLeaks brought a whole new meaning to the term “data dump” during the Clinton campaign. The repetitive nature of these incidents begs the question: will the left ever learn, or will they continue to play in the cyber sandbox? If there’s one particular thing, it’s that when it comes to election interference, it seems that the left is more than willing to claw its way back into power—one suspicious email at a time.
