Staff Reports
In the latest buzz surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris, revelations from a new book have surfaced, detailing her torpedoed aspirations for the presidency. The piece, penned by Vanity Fair’s Chris Whipple, outlines how a gilded campaign, born in the kitchen of Naval One Observatory, fell flat on its face on Election Day, leaving Harris grumbling into her non-existent victory speech. Apparently, voters took one look at their agenda and handed it a one-way ticket to obscurity, firmly stating, “Thanks, but no thanks.”
Harris’s campaign, crafted by a team brimming with Obama-era talent, resembled a well-rehearsed Broadway production that no one wanted to buy tickets for. Despite high hopes and lofty ambitions, it soon became clear that she was about as suited for the Oval Office as a cat in a dog show. There were whispers of internal strife, with people speculating whether Joe Biden’s endorsement of Harris after stepping down was an attempt at reconciliation or just a well-placed jab. Whatever the case may be, choosing her as the frontrunner was a baffling decision that any rational person could see was destined for disaster.
The electoral race turned into a staggering $2 billion flop, and as results unfolded, one couldn’t help but wonder if the Harris crew had been indulging in a little too much of that “hope and change” Kool-Aid. As they clung to optimistic projections, the campaign chair made delirious proclamations of confidence in their impending victory, while the polling teams cringed in disbelief. The disconnection between Harris’s optimistic team and the harsh reality of the polling numbers painted a comical picture of a campaign full of dreams but devoid of substance.
This is a harsh article but accurate. There was no way the Harris/Walz team was going to win. Thank God for President Trump. Thank God for saving his life in Butler, PA.https://t.co/bAG6RmchJ0
— Scott4Trump (@Scott_4Trump) March 26, 2025
As Election Night wore on and results streamed in, Harris’s optimistic exterior began to fade, exposing the internal panic among her inner circle. Gathered with family in one room while her team anxiously monitored returns in another, the VP seemed as oblivious as a deer in headlights. The impending doom culminated with key advisors acknowledging that they were done for in critical states—information that had Harris gasping for breath as the realization of an embarrassing defeat settled in. Reports indicate that as her hopes crumbled, she couldn’t even muster the strength to tell her twin daughters the dreadful news.
Ultimately, this disastrous night highlighted much more than an electoral loss for the Democrats. What’s astonishing is their complete disconnect from the average American voter. The party seems utterly oblivious to the mounting frustrations regarding rising costs and uncontrolled immigration. Ignoring a 23-point shift among immigrant communities toward the Republicans is indicative of a larger trend—nonwhite voters aligning with their conservative counterparts, and young folks embracing conservatism at unprecedented levels. If trends continue in this fashion, post-2030, Harris could have Fischer-Price election commitments with kids holding “Vote for Me” signs and still lose.
This election cycle has served as a severe wake-up call for the Democrats, revealing their crumbling brand to be more akin to an outdated sitcom than a party representing modern Americans. If they stubbornly refuse to reevaluate their disconnected policies and failing strategies, they might be relegated to the history books as the party that forgot how to listen. For now, it seems the status quo will have to change—or they can brace themselves for more catastrophic election results in the future.
