Staff Reports
Kamala Harris is once again avoiding a spotlight that gives her the jitters, opting out of this year’s Al Smith dinner set for October 17. The reason? It looks like spontaneity isn’t exactly her strong suit. Perhaps she’s concerned that she might actually have to interact with the public in a way that doesn’t involve a carefully curated script or stage-managed applause.
The Al Smith dinner, a long-standing tradition that gathers political heavyweights and celebrities for an evening of jokes and camaraderie, has always been a platform for politicians to showcase their personalities, a skill Harris seems to be sorely lacking. Instead of highlighting her ability to connect with voters, she’s apparently chosen to retreat to the safety of the scripted and the predictable—an approach that has left many questioning her capabilities as a leader.
Kamala Harris to skip traditional Al Smith dinner, first time presidential candidate has ducked charity event since 1984
– That's because she can't speak on her feet, and she's dumb as F**k…https://t.co/KIH3WiTajY
— Biff Smallberries (@B_Smallberries) September 22, 2024
Some might say it’s a wise move to keep her out of a potentially embarrassing situation, given her history of gaffes and awkwardness in unscripted moments. For a vice president who has been criticized for her fumbling performances, skipping out on an event known for light-hearted roasts might be the safest play. After all, who could forget the time she struggled to name a single book that influenced her deeply? Clearly, a room full of potential quips and good-natured banter doesn’t seem like her idea of a good time.
This avoidance tactic draws a stark contrast to her predecessor, Mike Pence, who regularly showed up and bravely took the punches thrown his way, all while holding his own. But that was then. Today’s political landscape, especially for Democrats, often resembles a minefield for those who might not be quick on their feet. Harris appears unwilling to take the risk of stepping into the potential political crossfire.
In a world where authenticity and relatability are often coveted characteristics in leadership, Harris’s decision to sit this one out only reinforces the narrative that she prefers to hide behind closed doors rather than face the public. While other candidates take such opportunities to show off their personality and win over skeptical voters, Harris is making it abundantly clear that when it comes to engaging with the electorate, she’d rather make herself scarce.
