Staff Reports
Vice President Kamala Harris is attempting to convince the American public that she holds the keys to economic prosperity, despite being part of an administration that has arguably put the economy in the ICU. This curious 180-degree maneuver is not only bizarre but also brazen given her track record. Harris has been entrenched in Washington for over three years, yet she seems to portray herself as an outsider, which raises eyebrows and questions about her own narrative. It’s hard to fathom coming from someone whose political career was launched in the deep blue waters of California—where even the temperature isn’t as hot as the liberal policies she supported.
No one really cast a vote for her in the same way they supported Joe Biden, who, let’s be honest, is only a heartbeat away from apple sauce brain status. Her time in the spotlight could be best summarized as nada, zip, and zilch when it comes to meaningful electoral wins or significant accomplishments. Just being an attorney general in a state that leans so far left it’s practically tipping over isn’t exactly a resume highlight; it’s about as impressive as having a goldfish as a pet.
Kamala Harris told America on debate night that Goldman Sachs and the Wharton School of Business said her economic plan is better than Trump’s.
Both Goldman and Wharton have now come out and said that she was lying. pic.twitter.com/jhThANvvkr
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 24, 2024
In a recent livestream event that featured the ever-glamorous Oprah, Harris tried to sell her supposedly robust economic agenda as the solution for America. She claimed that indeed, Goldman Sachs, Moody’s, the Wharton School of Business, and even 16 Nobel laureates backed her plans. However, the truth came crashing down faster than a Biden gaffe when those institutions denied backing her. In fact, the Penn Wharton Budget Model pushed back hard, stating they could not foresee any positive outcomes for the economy from her proposals. Instead, they pointed out Trump’s plan does indeed swell GDP—even if it dips later, it still beats Harris’s economic pixie dust approach.
Goldman Sachs wasn’t having it either. The financial giant described Harris’s claims as overly inflated, likening her use of an independent analyst’s report to a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat—except this was a rabbit that recoiled in horror. Let’s face it: no one really believes that the economic policies from the Biden-Harris duo could outshine those pinpointed by Trump, who is often credited with a booming economy pre-pandemic.
This all leads to a red flag: Harris doesn’t do herself any favors by dodging media interviews like a raccoon avoiding a trap. The less exposure she gets, the fewer opportunities she has to stumble over her own contradictions. As linchpins of the economy drift from the halls of power, conservative Americans should brace themselves for a lot more sound and fury over an administration’s economic prowess that is as lacking as a chocolate fireguard. The truth is out there, and it’s not painting a rosy picture for the Democrats.
