Staff Reports
The 2024 Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, finds herself facing a daunting challenge: engaging with the media. This is a necessity in American politics, undeniably tied to the role of president. Historically, the media has served as a megaphone for leaders, allowing them to showcase their vision and respond to the electorate. Unfortunately for Harris, her team seems to be aware that diving into this pool comes with its own set of risks. All eyes are on her, reminiscent of a high-wire act without a safety net—especially when the only tightrope she’s walked recently is the one between her inconsistent political stances.
Recently, internal discussions have surfaced concerning who would best conduct an interview with Harris that wouldn’t lead to potential disaster. According to sources, there’s a search for a journalist who can avoid uncomfortable questions about her shifting political positions, particularly her newfound support for the border wall—a policy that would make Donald Trump proud, and only after having previously dismissed it. The irony of a California liberal trying to adopt Trump’s policies adds a comical twist and certainly raises eyebrows about her credibility.
Not only is Kamala’s handler too afraid to let her do a press interview alone, it’s pre recorded. Just in case they need to edit out her laughing at dead soldiers again. Or something else totally inappropriate. pic.twitter.com/rxJSouNlTh
— Colette Harrington (@sweetcarolinatv) August 28, 2024
Politico dissected the Harris campaign’s struggles as they scramble to piece together a media approach. With a light schedule since accepting the nomination, it appears she isn’t just preparing for her impending debates with Trump; rather, she seems to be desperately trying to navigate her many flip-flops in public life. It’s clear her team is walking a tightrope of their own—sorting out who gets to steer the ship while Harris herself remains the main attraction, albeit one that requires careful handling to avoid capsizing.
The chaotic atmosphere within her camp is palpable. Communication adviser Brian Fallon headlines the decision-making process, but other big names like Stephanie Cutter have their own opinions swirling about the proper approach, prompting discussions that verge on sitcom-level absurdity. Instead of a united front on policy, it seems the campaign team is at odds regarding Harris’s narrative. The uncertainty of whether to present her for a rigorous interview or just in a casual conversation has some strategists scratching their heads—in what world does a candidate for the presidency require a scouting report on how to do their job?
Adding to the comedy is the decision-making concerning Tim Walz, Harris’s running mate. It raises the question of whether Walz would even be able to articulate Harris’s ever-evolving political agenda. His own potential interviews could reveal gaping holes in their policy discussions that would make even the most forgiving voters squirm. What’s lost amidst these internal squabbles is the overarching question: who is Kamala Harris, besides a one-dimensional politician in search of her identity? It appears that the media will soon have its chance to peel back the layers, but at this point, the only thing peeling seems to be her credibility as she flounders ahead of the debates.
In summary, the upcoming interviews and debates present a perfect storm of chaos and confusion. Kamala Harris is caught in a whirlwind of her own making—a laughable spectacle, complete with her quick policy reversals and tenuous grasp on leadership. The idea that she wants to command the top office in the land while avoiding tough questions is nothing short of absurd. If history serves as a guide, the upcoming media exposure will likely be a clunky display worthy of a slapstick comedy, an ongoing testament to the inherent weaknesses of a campaign that seems to be setting itself up for a spectacular fall.
