Staff Reports
CNN’s latest town hall featuring Vice President Kamala Harris was nothing short of a comedy of errors, laying bare the inadequacies of her campaign ahead of the upcoming elections. The event was rife with awkward moments that could have easily been scripted for a late-night talk show rather than a serious political platform. When Harris was posed the seemingly straightforward question about what she would do if Roe v. Wade legislation couldn’t be codified in the House, her answer involved a vague reference to reconsidering the filibuster. This response left viewers scratching their heads and wondering if anyone had pressed the “easy button” for her.
The cringe-worthy moments continued when an audience member asked what weaknesses she brings to the table. Harris launched into a disjointed ramble that could be generously described as a word salad. Her not-so-artful admission that she may sometimes need time to answer questions because she is “kind of a nerd” provoked laughter, though not the kind one would hope for from a presidential hopeful. Instead of conveying confidence and capability, she simply reiterated her weakness as a lack of decisiveness—hardly a winning quality for someone vying for the highest office in the land.
The fallout from this disastrous performance was palpable among the CNN panelists who typically tout the Democratic narrative with glee. Dana Bash and her colleagues opined that Harris hadn’t quite “closed the deal.” It was an observation that struck at the heart of the matter: this administration’s inability to articulate clear policies and stoke enthusiasm among the electorate. The fact that even CNN’s own reporters engaged in such frank criticism underscores the depth of Harris’s struggles.
What Jen Rubin's Hysterical Reaction to 'Didn't Close the Deal' CNN Segment Says About Kamala's Campaignhttps://t.co/g28r9y2Iyv
— RedState (@RedState) October 24, 2024
Amidst the reactions, one cannot overlook the hyperbolic response by Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post, who seems almost desperate to maintain a façade of competence surrounding the vice president. Rubin’s comments reflected more about her own biases than about Harris’s performance—simply put, her disdain for Donald Trump appears to have clouded her judgment to the point of lunacy. It’s a classic case of political blinders: instead of acknowledging the failings of the campaign, the focus shifts to fabricating conspiracies about the media unfairly targeting Harris.
As the election looms closer, the pressure is mounting on Harris and her supporters, and the cracks are becoming more visible. In key battleground states such as North Carolina and Nevada, early voting numbers aren’t just worrisome—they’re downright alarming for Democrats who expected a massive turnout. If Harris can’t even shine on a friendly platform like CNN, one has to question how she plans to connect with skeptical voters across the nation.
The anxious chatter from those in Harris’s camp is telling. They can’t hide their discomfort as they realize that the landscape is shifting under their feet. The desperate hope that a few rehearsed lines and some laughs will save the campaign is fading fast. It’s a reminder that charm and cackles can only get one so far, and substance is what truly moves the needle. As things stand, Kamala Harris seems unprepared to rise to the occasion, and the scripted applause is growing quiet with every passing moment.
