Staff Reports
Vice President Kamala Harris seems to have taken a page out of a magician’s playbook, disappearing from the media circuit just when the nation might want to hear her thoughts on the issues of the day. With her visibility dwindling even as she holds a position of considerable power, one has to wonder whether her absence is a strategic move or a case of mere stage fright. Recently, she finally emerged from her media cocoon to tackle some pressing topics, but skeptics are left wondering if this is just a fleeting moment or if she plans to make frequent appearances.
The buzz surrounding Harris isn’t just about her scarcity in interviews; it’s also about the substance—or, more accurately, the lack thereof—when she does decide to speak. Critics argue that she seems more likely to dodge questions than tackle policy debates head-on, especially when compared to her predecessor, former President Donald Trump. While Trump has always been known for his colorful commentary, Harris’s commentary often feels like it’s been carefully prepped by a team of PR professionals and then watered down for public consumption. One has to question whether her handlers are worried she might actually answer something unscripted.
When it comes to policy disputes with Trump, particularly concerning foreign relations, Harris clearly trails behind. The former president’s assertive stance on Iran, characterized by a strong message that the U.S. wouldn’t tolerate any nonsense from rogue states, sharply contrasts with Harris’s more compliant approach. Under Trump, the narrative was one of strength and deterrence, whereas Harris’s foreign policy seems to lean towards a more lenient attitude that raises eyebrows and leads to valid concerns about America’s position on the global stage.
Washington Examiner: Reporter’s Notebook: Harris’s MSNBC interview https://t.co/ACcLVFibSy
— Ian Hansen News 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHansenNews) September 28, 2024
In the wake of ongoing tensions with Iran, one has to wonder how the Vice President plans to address criticisms over her foreign policy. It seems almost comedic that while Trump garnered headlines for taking a hard-nosed approach to nations that challenge U.S. interests, Harris is attempting to navigate through the political minefield with a level of softness that some might equate to throwing a pillow instead of a punch. This situation raises the question of whether she has a plan, or if she’s just hoping for the best while keeping the giggles to a minimum.
Overall, while it would be nice for the country to have a Vice President who is more forthcoming and engaged with the media, it appears Harris prefers the safety of the shadows. With Trump’s impact still resonating in national politics, the contrast couldn’t be clearer. And recognizing the disparities in demeanor might just be the most telling indicators about the state of current leadership—one more willing to stand in the spotlight and one who’s still figuring out how to turn on the microphone. The media might just need to keep a lookout, or else they might miss the next vaudeville act starring Harris.
