Staff Reports
Vice President Kamala Harris has taken gun control to a whole new level, proving she might be even more dangerous to Second Amendment rights than President Joe Biden. A recently resurfaced video from her days as a California district attorney showcases her alarming promise to intrude into the sanctity of Americans’ homes to confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens. Yes, you read that right. In 2007, she suggested that just because someone legally owns a firearm doesn’t mean they are safe. Apparently, Harris believed she had the right to barge into private residences to ensure compliance with her version of “responsible” gun ownership.
During her time as a prosecutor, she openly advocated for legislation that would impose strict penalties on gun owners for not storing their weapons properly. When discussing her draconian plans, Harris made it clear that keeping a legally possessed firearm in a locked home wasn’t enough to escape her watchful eye. She indicated that her administration would happily invade spaces to enforce compliance, giving no regard to the fact that innocent Americans were simply exercising their constitutional rights.
HOLY SMOKES. Unearthed footage shows San Francisco DA Kamala Harris vowing to FORCIBLY ENTER HOMES to check how private gun owners are storing their firearms.
This video just sealed Trump’s victory.
We’ve never had a nominee this extreme.
pic.twitter.com/91wbAIgNnN— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) September 18, 2024
Some might call this approach an “overreach,” but Harris has dressed it up as legislation that reflects “our values.” It’s almost amusing how this narrative is spun to sound like a behavior improvement program rather than what it actually is: a blatant assault on personal freedoms. And of course, this bill had the enthusiastic backing of her buddy Gavin Newsom, then the mayor of San Francisco, who has proudly claimed that the city holds the strictest anti-gun laws in the country.
Fast forward to the present, and the Vice President finds herself in an awkward position. Recently, during a presidential debate, she let slip that both she and her running mate Tim Walz are gun owners. How is this reconciled with her history of endorsing aggressive gun confiscation? Harris seems to be attempting a strategic distancing from Biden’s policies while painting herself as the middle-road candidate. However, this is akin to trying to sell a three-legged stool as a solid piece of furniture—it just doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.
Notably, the Harris-Walz campaign has been touting their gun “buyback” plan, which sounds ever so sweet until one realizes that this is nothing short of government-sanctioned confiscation masquerading as a choice. Under this scheme, gun owners won’t be offered an option—they will be compelled to surrender their legally owned firearms or face severe repercussions. Lee Williams from the Second Amendment Foundation has warned that their campaign is not just about gun buybacks for AR-15s; they’re eyeing shotguns, handguns, and anything else they deem undesirable.
Williams and others have pointed out the rather shocking implications of the Harris-Walz agenda. Beyond mere confiscation, there lies a deep-rooted goal to eradicate civilian firearms altogether. Harris’s cozy ties with China and her penchant for Soviet-style regulation raise serious questions about her commitment to the Constitution. With her at the helm of the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, there are fears that taxpayer dollars are being funneled into crafting radical, unconstitutional laws designed to infringe on the Second Amendment rights of Americans.
And as if this wasn’t enough, the Harris campaign insists that despite her flip-flopping on policies, her values are steadfast. While the left may cling to her reassurances, it’s hard to ignore the ever-growing list of rights she has willingly put on the chopping block. The fact remains that her promises of safety come at the steep cost of liberty, something that should keep every freedom-loving American wide awake at night.
