Staff Reports
When considering the qualities necessary for the President of the United States, one cannot help but recognize that intelligence should be at the top of the list. After all, this is the individual tasked with leading the free world, overseeing the military, and having access to America’s nuclear arsenal. Yet, with Joe Biden in office—who has exhibited growing signs of cognitive decline since before 2020—the bar for presidential intellect seems to be set alarmingly low. This raises serious concerns as his second-in-command, Kamala Harris, appears to be vying to take the reins should Biden step aside.
Harris’s trajectory to the vice presidency was more like a magic trick than an election. She was not chosen by the voters but was rather thrust into the spotlight, and now she is campaigning as if she has a claim to the office. Instead of focusing on her own qualifications, Harris has taken to reiterating the tired trope that Donald Trump poses an unprecedented threat to democracy. This rhetoric might resonate with the faithful, but it’s a flimsy defense when the alternative leadership is lacking substance.
It Takes Some Smarts to Be President – So Far, Kamala Harris Hasn't Shown She Has Them https://t.co/pHC2TwIKVp
— Flopping Aces (@FloppingAces) October 14, 2024
Spotting a true leader often relies on the ability to communicate effectively and creatively. Unfortunately, Harris’s communication skills leave much to be desired. Many observers have noted her propensity for using empty phrases and jargon, filling her speeches with monotonous buzzwords instead of meaningful content. This penchant for verbal filler dilutes her message and contributes to an impression of superficiality, as her grasp of complex issues seems tenuous at best. When listening to her speak, the American public is often left wondering if she understands the topics at all.
Moreover, the likability factor plays a crucial role in political success, and Harris struggles immensely in this regard. Unlike past Democratic figures who could at least muster a portion of charm, she often ends up resembling a less charismatic version of her predecessors. Her attempts at authenticity appear contrived, and therein lies her biggest downfall. Trying to connect with voters through artificially crafted narratives has only served to alienate them further.
The current political landscape is revealing to those willing to look. While comedians and late-night television hosts have notoriously reserved their jabs for Republican leaders, they are increasingly finding humor in Kamala Harris’s frequent verbal misfires and uncanny ability to deliver incoherent messages. If even comedians are making her the butt of their jokes, it signals a disheartening truth about her viability as a candidate. The general voting population is catching on, and her approval ratings are beginning to reflect these sentiments.
In summary, the case against Kamala Harris’s candidacy is becoming clearer by the day. Her seemingly permanent lack of depth, combined with a communication style that begs for clarity, paints a grim picture for her political future. The American public deserves better than a leader who echoes the antics of a second-rate soap opera character. With the stakes so high and the potential for leadership at a premium, it is evident that reliance on intelligence—not merely rhetoric—will be essential if the nation hopes to thrive.
