In the glitzy world of multi-million-dollar beachfront mansions and super yachts, climate change has become quite the buzzword. You may remember being told that your air conditioner usage, your daily commute, and even the ice in your soda were not just inconveniences but planetary sins. They told you hurricanes and heatwaves were all your fault. From Hollywood elites to political bigwigs, this narrative has been drilled into us: the world is ending unless you change your cozy ways. Yet, these same folks preaching doom and gloom seem to have a different rulebook when it comes to their property investments.
Let’s take a look at a few climate change prophets, shall we? We’ve got former President Barack Obama, who, despite warning about rising sea levels, continues to invest in breathtaking oceanfront properties. Then there’s Vice President Kamala Harris, who has been reported to have invested in expensive property that seemingly contradicts her message about coastline threats.
And the list doesn’t stop there. Tech tycoon Bill Gates, self-proclaimed climate warrior Al Gore, and Vermont’s very own Bernie Sanders have all similarly settled down in areas they themselves deemed to be climate crisis hot spots. Fancy that—a beachfront villa must be the perfect retreat when you’re predicting that coastlines will vanish under ten feet of water any day now. It’s almost like they don’t believe their own hype, or maybe they know something we don’t.
Moreover, there’s an amusing twist in the political narrative. The same figures railing against lavish, exclusive lifestyles don’t mind indulging in them behind gated communities. A little rich to hear cries of “tax the rich” and calls for open borders, while they fortress themselves among the wealthiest neighborhoods. Kamala Harris’ properties, which are reportedly in secure and affluent areas, stand as a stark symbol of this irony.
So, what’s the real message here? Simple: it’s all about saying one thing while doing another. The very people raising alarms on climate change are leading the charge into prime real estate in areas allegedly at risk. Why? Because those sea levels aren’t rising for the folks buying up these pricey ocean views. They aren’t pulling their hair out about climate change, and neither are the banks financing these grand purchases. If they were really worried, you wouldn’t be able to get a mortgage on a property supposedly doomed to underwater futures.
In the end, while average families are encouraged to ditch their comforts under the guise of saving the planet, it seems some of the loudest voices in the climate change choir are busy picking out which coastal paradise to call home next. Who knew the apocalypse could be such a beachfront bonanza?

