Staff Reports
In a world gone mad with liberal delusions, it seems there’s still one voice daring enough to speak truth to foolishness. In the lion’s den of CNN, alongside Abby Phillip and her merry band of Trump detractors, Kevin O’Leary took the stage and did the unthinkable—he spoke common sense. The network, always spinning yarns to cover for the left’s missteps, was unprepared for O’Leary’s bold truth bombs. Despite their attempts to shut him down, he stood firm. The media’s embrace of Kamala Harris as some unassailable hero is laughable at best, distressing at worst.
O’Leary’s appearance was a revelation, a glaring reminder of the disconnect between leftist fantasies and reality. While the liberal panel wrung their hands over token gifts and imaginary constitutional crises, O’Leary dared to point out the sheer lunacy of it all—the journalists frothing at the mouth, brimming with anti-Trump hysteria. They are yet to come to terms with Kamala Harris’s glaring political loss, clinging to a failed narrative that elevates failure to the status of victory.
Harris’s defeat wasn’t just a setback; it was a grand exposure of the left’s hollow promises. It’s hard to ignore the shipwreck that was her political career, a disaster some in the media are desperate to bury. They love to deflect and distract, but O’Leary made it impossible to ignore the facts. It must be difficult for the legacy media to hide her inability to succeed on her own merits. But here’s the truth: Kamala Harris was beaten decisively, a reality that liberal pundits choose to ignore as they pine over their lost election dreams.
CNN Panel, Abby Phillip Try to Shut Down Kevin O'Leary on Kamala Loss, but He Makes Painful Parting Shot https://t.co/yc15ZfC1rN
— Rachel Morse (@rm36863307) May 15, 2025
Even when sellers of liberal propaganda attempted to belittle him, O’Leary held steady, maneuvering through the chaos like a captain through stormy seas. He pinned down the absurdity of anointing Harris as a champion when she’s proven otherwise. Of course, in true liberal fashion, when faced with the bare bones truth, the network opted to pull the plug rather than address the inconvenient realities of their chosen narrative. After all, why engage with facts when denial is so much simpler?
In the end, when will the left wake up and see what’s right before their eyes? How much longer will they cling to leaders who can’t string together coherent policies, let alone sentences? The choice to remain in this state of denial is their prerogative, but one question remains: when will they start listening to voices like O’Leary’s, voices grounded in reality and armed with the one thing liberals refuse to accept—truth.
