Staff Reports
Senator James Lankford recently weighed in on the political dynamics surrounding a potential second Trump administration and the Department of Justice. While many Americans are eagerly anticipating this new chapter, Lankford acknowledged that uncertainty looms over how the Trump administration might handle the Department. It seems that even the senator isn’t quite sure whether President Trump would allow the DOJ to function free of partisan pressure, echoing a concern that has become the hallmark of Democratic rhetoric for years.
According to Lankford, loyalty seems to be the name of the game in Trump’s Cabinet choices. The Oklahoma Republican suggested that Trump would prefer a team that aligns with his vision rather than just any run-of-the-mill bureaucrat. The implication is clear: as long as Cabinet members share Trump’s priorities, everything else might just be left in the dust. After all, who wouldn’t want a team that strives for the same goals? It’s a lot easier to tackle America’s challenges when everyone is onboard—imagine trying to assemble a puzzle with half the pieces upside down.
In a recent twist, Trump’s first attorney general pick, former Congressman Matt Gaetz, made a quick exit from consideration. This departure comes just as rumors swirl around some unsavory allegations. In the true spirit of the swamp, the ethical concerns surrounding Gaetz could be the perfect example of why draining it is a top priority for conservatives. But fear not, for Trump’s second choice, Pam Bondi, also has a robust track record—serving as one of Trump’s defense lawyers during his first impeachment. It’s like picking a star player from your own bench; at least they already understand the field.
Lankford, breathing a sigh of relief, reminded everyone that the role of attorney general is meant to serve the interests of the American people, not the whims of a president. According to him, the AG should act as “America’s lawyer.” Sure, it’s a comforting notion, but it’s hard not to chuckle at the idea when the DOJ has served as a political weapon in the hands of the left for years. The rhetoric of fairness and justice seems a tad hollow when it is often used to undermine the president rather than promote the rule of law.
Sen. James Lankford: We don’t know ‘one way or another’ how DOJ will act with political interferencehttps://t.co/oqfWMJOisw pic.twitter.com/jOhtfJ6Q1D
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) November 25, 2024
The senator made it clear that having an attorney general who is focused on real issues, like crime reduction and effective prosecutions, is vital. Yet one can’t help but wonder if Lankford has listened to the Democrats lately. Who needs a deep dive into crime when they can distract the public with endless investigations into the alleged sins of the right? A national conversation on true justice might finally take place if the DOJ decides to cut the theatrics and focus on serving the American people, instead of turning the Justice Department into a political circus.
As the countdown to a potential second Trump term continues, the question remains whether any DOJ bureaucrat will dare to step outside the boundaries of partisanship. One thing is certain—conservatives will be watching closely for any signs of balance in how justice is administered, and whether the next attorney general will have the courage to shield the office from political theatrics, perhaps finally reclaiming it for the average American.
