Staff Reports
Joe Biden has once again raised eyebrows as it’s reported he has been using an autopen to sign a staggering amount of paperwork—from executive orders to routine appointments. In an age where the leader of the free world might be expected to pick up a pen personally, this revelation has sparked concerns about the president’s involvement in decisions that shape the nation. Critics have pointed out that the use of an autopen prompts crucial questions about leadership, accountability, and, let’s face it, basic effort.
For those not in the know, an autopen is basically a machine that replicates handwriting. One has to wonder—are Americans paying top dollar for a leader who can’t even muster the energy to sign his own name? While many view Biden’s reliance on technology as a bizarre manifestation of outdated bureaucratic processes, it also serves as a stark reminder of the current administration’s approach to governance: detached, distant, and a tad lazy. It’s hard to imagine a more fitting symbol of a presidency that’s all about delegation instead of direct involvement.
The autopen usage raises eyebrows not just for the question of authenticity but for transparency as well. Legislative agendas and critical decisions that affect millions are now churned out from an office where the president reportedly spends more time in meetings than actually leading. Many are left wondering if voters ever really chose a leader or simply signed up for a low-energy, AI-assisted version of the office. It becomes all the more concerning when accountability is being rubber-stamped right out of existence.
If Congress (itself full of gerontocrats) doesn’t want to mandate regular mental-health checks for every president, it should at least require that he or she truly sign every law and executive order.https://t.co/wwY9ZJ3bel
— Just Regular Rob (@reg1776) March 12, 2025
Moreover, the situation has opened the floodgates for contrasting narratives. GOP members have quickly seized on this revelation, using it as a rhetorical weapon against Biden’s leadership style (or lack thereof). It’s hard to defend a president who can’t even sign his name with conviction. It creates a tableau of a leader who seems more involved with social media fluctuations than the urgent matters of state. This bizarre and rather embarrassing episode serves as a case study on the perils of prioritizing appearances over action.
As more Americans catch wind of Biden’s autopen escapades, one can only anticipate the onslaught of memes, comedic takes, and viral videos mocking the Commander in Chief. The use of a machine to handle the signing represent not just a practical tool, but a glaring metaphor for the broader concerns surrounding the Biden administration: a preference for doing the minimum while maintaining an illusion of productivity. If being president is just about pressing buttons, then America might as well appoint a glorified robot to take over. After all, what could possibly go wrong?
