In a recent turn of events, it seems Luigi Mangione, a man more notorious for his violent actions than his political insights, is being compared to Donald Trump. The left, ever eager to find a revolutionary hero, has turned a murderer into some sort of cultural icon. CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan, known for his peculiar brand of reporting, suggested that sympathizing with Mangione is akin to supporting the former president. This not-so-subtle attempt to equate the actions of a convicted killer with millions of Americans who simply want to make their voices heard through the ballot box is nothing short of absurd.
Taylor Lorenz, once a reputable journalist and now morphing into an internet personality, seems enamored by Mangione, describing him as a “revolutionary” figure. One must wonder if in her quest for clicks, she has lost sight of the difference between a culture of lawfulness and one that celebrates thuggery. Lorenz claims that women, in particular, gravitate toward Mangione because he embodies traits that seem increasingly rare in today’s world. Apparently, nothing signals moral worth like a flashy façade over an unsettling reality—even if that reality includes, you know, murder.
The left’s fascination with rebellion has hit an alarming new low, confusing murder with meaningful social change. O’Sullivan’s premise that both Trump supporters and fans of Mangione spring from a place of desperation is telling. While Trump supporters rallied at the ballot box, pushing for reforms and real change, Mangione’s advocates seem more content with a violent narrative. It’s a classic case of misplacing admiration—wanting to tear down the system rather than working through it.
Is Luigi Mangione the Left's Donald Trump?https://t.co/TVz9P1w3E4
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) April 15, 2025
Meanwhile, the contrast couldn’t be more stark: Trump’s movement is rooted in political action; the left, however, appears to be leaning more toward destructive acts in the streets. Recent acts of vandalism and violence against those who hold conservative values signal an increasingly dangerous trend amongst the far left, showcasing a preference for chaos over constructive dialogue. While having a conversation about good governance, the left seems to be playing with fire.
CNN’s coverage misses the real story, opting instead for sensationalism that brandishes the peaceful political activism of the right alongside the violent hero-worship of the left. A media outlet that equates engaging in democracy with attracting a criminal’s admirers has lost its grip on actual journalism. Perhaps if they diverted their attention from creating sensational stories and examined the ramifications of glorifying violence, they might actually contribute to a more balanced dialogue. But who needs journalism when there’s sensationalism to sell?
In the grand scheme, while the right channels its enthusiasm into viable political platforms, the left claps along as the revolutionary fantasies take hold, never mind the consequences. Mangione might be this generation’s tragic anti-hero for some, but it’s worth remembering that those glamorous narratives often come with a sinister reality. The difference between a political movement and a cult of personality is critical here, and it’s time the media did its job in differentiating the two: one calls for reform, while the other calls for revolt.