Staff Reports
In today’s America, we see the full extent of the liberal mess that is infecting our once orderly justice system. The latest episode, which unfolded like a bad sitcom, involves an event of stunning irresponsibility following a Kamala Harris rally in Wisconsin. A man named Wayne Wacker performed a live-action demonstration of what happens when unchecked recklessness meets the left’s lenient attitude towards personal responsibility.
Wacker, a 55-year-old whose actions put Harris’ entire motorcade in danger, was found weaving through traffic with the kind of audacity Biden and his cronies reserve for rolling back basic rights. He was drunk, passed out on patriotism, and driving the wrong way down a major highway. If this had been a Conservative event, it’s almost certain the left would be demanding the full weight of the law come down on him like a ton of politically correct bricks. But as it stands, he walked away with two years of probation—a slap on the wrist at best.
It’s highly questionable whether Wacker’s reckless escapade deserved mere misdemeanor charges. Let’s be clear: this could have been a catastrophe with a capital “C.” When a man recklessly tears down a highway, narrowly missing the VP’s motorcade, perhaps we should be having a broader conversation about the double standards that rule our legal system under Democratic oversight. Leftists talk a big game of law and order when it suits their agenda, yet these lowball sentences reveal a softer approach when it doesn’t.
JUST IN: The Wisconsin special education teacher who drove the wrong way on I-94 as Kamala Harris’ motorcade passed through after a rally avoids jail time
Wayne Wacker, 55, passed 29 vehicles in the convoy before being stopped by a deputy
He was charged with second-degree… pic.twitter.com/jCxSctUGDR
— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) April 29, 2025
Call it liberal leniency or just plain recklessness; this judicial slapstick routine ends with the left evading accountability, again. The judge’s decision summoned more courtroom drama as Wacker’s defense tried to paint him as simply too inebriated to know better. Americans have heard all this before—under the Democratic regime, ignorance, and idiocy too often eclipse good old-fashioned accountability.
Are we really to believe that Wacker, who knew exactly where he was headed, didn’t grasp the life-threatening peril he posed? This decision sets a troubling precedent—that in liberal America, knowing you’re wrong isn’t so bad as long as you claim it’s because you were too drunk to realize it. Why punish drunken idiocy when coddling it is much easier?
As we let liberals bumble their way into managing our justice system, one might wonder: what’s next? When recklessness brushes past responsibility without consequence, how much longer until America veers off cliff’s edge?
