Staff Reports
The mainstream media is once again at the center of controversy, this time regarding a Supreme Court decision about the Biden administration’s controversial emergency abortion mandate and Idaho’s pro-life law. In an unusual move, the Supreme Court initially agreed to review the case before the appeals court had finished its deliberations, only to later dismiss it without a decision in a 5-4 vote.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the Biden administration issued a regulation requiring hospitals to provide abortion as emergency medical care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which would override state pro-life laws like Idaho’s Defense of Life Act. A federal district court in Idaho sided with HHS, prompting Idaho to appeal to the Ninth Circuit, which led to the Supreme Court’s temporary involvement.
Media Screws Up Supreme Court Flubbed Punt of Abortion Case https://t.co/fJFSSD1Phe via @BreitbartNews
— Nancy Crebs (@CrebsNancy) June 27, 2024
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan indicated their inclination to rule against Idaho’s pro-life law, aligning with the administration’s stance on abortion. In contrast, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, supported upholding Idaho’s law and criticized the Court's indecisiveness.
Ultimately, Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Brett Kavanaugh voted to dismiss the case, citing the evolving nature of the proceedings as their reason. The mainstream media has portrayed this as a victory for abortion rights, overlooking the ongoing legal battle in the Ninth Circuit and its broader implications.
The Supreme Court’s handling of this case has sparked controversy and raised questions about its willingness to address critical issues. The clash between the Biden administration’s abortion mandate and states’ rights is ongoing, and conservatives must remain vigilant in defending the sanctity of life against the pro-abortion agenda.
