admin
Zohran Mamdani’s so‑called “tax reform” isn’t a nuanced fiscal plan — it’s a naked power play dressed up as fairness. His campaign has openly discussed measures like a 2 percent surcharge on incomes above $1 million, a sharp corporate tax increase, rent freezes for stabilized units and a property‑tax reallocation aimed at shifting burdens toward pricier neighborhoods. Those are not abstract ideas; they are concrete proposals that would punish investment and small business employers who still keep these cities running.
Conservative critics aren’t exaggerating when they call out the plan’s targeting of wealthier, whiter neighborhoods as identity‑politics by other means. Major outlets and editorials have parsed the language on Mamdani’s site and warned that lowering assessments for some areas while ratcheting up effective rates in expensive enclaves amounts to picking winners and losers by neighborhood demographics. This is a dangerous precedent: taxing people differently because of where they live — and who lives there — brings the kind of divisive politics that hollow out civic trust.
Even mainstream Democrats have recoiled at the obvious political and economic risks. New York Governor Kathy Hochul publicly said she would not support big new taxes on the wealthy at a time when affordability and job creation should be the priority, a frank admission that radical tax hikes could accelerate the very exodus of residents and businesses politicians claim to worry about. If Democrats in Albany and City Hall won’t back this, ordinary New Yorkers should ask why Mamdani thinks he can.
Business leaders and investors have begun to speak plainly, and Grant Cardone — CEO of Cardone Capital — told Rob Schmitt Tonight that Mamdani’s proposals are a “terrible look” that will scare capital away and accelerate the flight from cities already suffering from high costs and rising disorder. Cardone’s blunt assessment should be a wake‑up call for any policymaker who believes punishing success is the same as helping the working class; the opposite is true — you chase away employers, entrepreneurs and the tax base that funds services.
The numbers back up that warning: during and after the pandemic millions of Americans reevaluated city life and moved to lower‑cost, safer communities, with major analyses showing hundreds of thousands leaving the largest urban counties in 2021–2023 alone. This isn’t vague hand‑waving — it’s a sustained migration pattern driven by affordability, safety and quality of life concerns that punitive tax schemes only make worse. Policymakers who double down on tax hikes risk turning a temporary trend into a permanent hollowing‑out.
New York City’s own recent population swings show how real the consequences are: census and county data revealed dramatic out‑migration from urban cores when costs and policies stacked against residents and property owners. When government rewards political theater over practical economics, homeowners, small landlords and middle‑class professionals all look for safer harbors, taking their spending, jobs and community engagement with them. The smart conservative answer is to lower burdens, restore public safety and make cities affordable again — not to invent new ways to squeeze productive people.
Americans who still believe in opportunity should be furious that a rising political faction thinks the way to help the needy is to punish the productive. If leaders want to revive cities, they should be cutting red tape, securing the streets, and making pro‑growth reforms — not crafting headline‑grabbing taxes that drive investment out. Grant Cardone is right to call this out; hardworking New Yorkers and every patriotic American deserve mayors who build prosperity, not politicians who weaponize class and neighborhood against the very people who make urban life possible.
