admin
On the weekend of October 18, 2025, the so-called “No Kings” rallies filled streets in thousands of towns and cities across America in what organizers boasted was another mass day of resistance. What the mainstream press calls peaceful civic engagement was, in reality, a coordinated national operation orchestrated by the activist network Indivisible and its affiliates — a political movement wrapped in the language of patriotism but aimed squarely at undermining our elected leadership.
At the center of this machine are Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg, the husband-and-wife founders and co-executive directors of Indivisible, an organization born inside Democratic congressional offices after the 2016 election. Levin and Greenberg parlayed that origin into a permanent activist infrastructure that now directs protests, training programs, and political pressure campaigns across the country — not the spontaneous grassroots uprisings their messaging would have you believe.
Behind the smiling rhetoric about defending democracy sits cold, hard money. Public filings and reporting show Indivisible’s nonprofit arms have received substantial grants from well-known left-leaning foundations, including millions from the Open Society network, the philanthropic vehicle long associated with George Soros. When a political operation depends on large grants from partisan foundations, it ceases to be a neighborhood rally and becomes a national political project with a bankroll.
Conservatives should not shrug at the language being used by organizers who insist they are merely protesting “authoritarianism.” Indivisible coordinated thousands of protests on specific dates and promoted centralized toolkits and training — the same playbook used by groups that try to topple governments overseas and then call it a “color revolution.” Whether paid for by foundations or powered by tech platforms, the result is the same: an organized campaign to delegitimize and destabilize elected institutions.
The personnel ties make the picture clearer. Leah Greenberg’s career path and associations — including work for Democratic campaigns and close ties to figures who have served in leadership roles inside the Open Society orbit — show this is less an organic popular movement and more a professionalized activist enterprise. These relationships matter because they explain how local marches suddenly become national storylines on cue.
Look at the local rollouts to see the agenda. Events described as “No Kings Days of Peaceful Action” in places like Santa Barbara featured speakers from Planned Parenthood and other partisan groups, revealing that organizers are using “anti-authoritarian” branding as cover for a far-left policy agenda. This is not about defending liberty; it is about advancing a political program that many hardworking Americans find dangerous and out of touch.
Patriots ought to recognize the stakes and respond accordingly. Expose the networks, demand transparency about who bankrolls nationwide agitation, and keep holding public officials accountable for enabling these mobilizations. When millions are mobilized on schedule by a financed activist ecosystem, Americans deserve to know whether what is being sold as civic virtue is actually a well-funded, partisan campaign to overturn the will of the people.
