admin
The corporate-media meltdown over the so-called “double tap” boat strike was always more theater than fact, and the latest reporting proves that many of their breathless narratives were built on rumor and outrage, not evidence. Recent accounts show the Pentagon knew the operation’s objective and the chain of command involved, undermining attempts to turn a complex counter-narcotics action into a simplistic moral panic. Americans tired of media hysteria deserve the full story, not the predictable pile-on from outlets that cheer for chaos.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has repeatedly said he did not personally see survivors after the first strike and that he moved on to other duties, only later learning that Admiral Frank Bradley ordered a follow-on engagement to ensure the vessel was destroyed. Hegseth pointed to the fog of war and defended the judgment of on-scene commanders, a position any patriotic supporter of our troops should at least respect pending a full accounting. The rush to criminalize split-second battlefield decisions without viewing the classified context is exactly the kind of political theater our enemies want.
The administration has defended the operation as lawful under a narrow legal framework meant to deal with unflagged vessels used to traffic narcotics and fund violent organizations, arguing the follow-up strike was conducted to sink the boat and eliminate an ongoing threat. Those legal opinions, while disputed by some on the left, reflect a serious effort to give commanders clear rules of engagement in a dangerous maritime environment where cartel profits fuel real violence. If Washington’s critics want to argue about the law, do it after the facts are on the table — not from cable-TV stages where the goal is scoring headlines, not safeguarding the country.
Congressional concern is predictable, and both sides of the aisle have demanded answers — but let’s be honest about who is driving the narrative. Some lawmakers immediately turned the incident into a partisan cudgel, while others asked for sober briefings and classified evidence to avoid gut-reaction judgments that could endanger operations or our servicemembers. Americans should want a responsible, evidence-based inquiry that protects classified sources and methods while ensuring accountability, not a televised witch hunt.
This strike was not an isolated stunt; it was part of a wider Trump administration campaign begun in September to blunt the maritime drug routes that flood our communities with deadly fentanyl and empower criminal networks. Over 20 strikes and dozens of suspected smugglers have been targeted as part of that effort, showing a seriousness on the part of this administration to confront a threat Democrats long ignored. If leftist elites and their media allies actually cared about American lives, they’d applaud an administration willing to take the fight to the cartels instead of playing politics with it.
For years the same people who now feign horror cheered on signature drone strikes and other aggressive measures when they were useful to a different political coalition; this double standard is unseemly and predictable. Rather than clutching pearls about battlefield decisions, those critics should ask why we are still losing the drug war at home and why soft-on-crime policies and open-border naiveté keep giving cartels room to operate. Americans want results and security — not sanctimony from coastal pundits who never have to walk past an opioid clinic in Main Street, USA.
We should demand transparency where appropriate, but we should also demand fairness: protect classified information, hold individuals accountable if wrongdoing is proven, and stop the instant-conviction media trials. Secretary Hegseth and Admiral Bradley deserve the presumption that they acted in America’s interest until a full, sober review says otherwise; meanwhile, let’s keep our focus where it belongs — on defeating the cartels, shutting the drug pipelines, and defending American communities from the violence and addiction they export. Patriots will stand with our commanders when they fight for us, and we will demand answers when the evidence requires them.
