admin
The so-called narco‑terrorism narrative the left and much of the press rushed to embrace is unraveling fast, and honest Americans should be furious at the double standard. Reporting has now acknowledged the messy reality of the boat strikes — including confusion over a follow‑on strike that reportedly hit survivors — yet the media keeps pointing fingers before the facts land. This isn’t a debate about adjectives; it’s about whether the press will stop weaponizing tragedy to score political points.
The administration has been blunt: this is Operation Southern Spear, a lawful campaign to disrupt maritime drug trafficking tied to designated terror groups, and the Pentagon says each strike was vetted and executed to protect the homeland. Officials insist commanders followed rules of engagement and targeted vessels trafficking huge quantities of narcotics that have poisoned American families for years. Conservatives understand that national security sometimes requires hard choices, and deterrence only works if it’s backed by decisive action.
Practical results matter more than performative grief from celebrities and cable hosts, and there’s tangible evidence that these strikes have intercepted serious contraband — partner nations have salvaged large caches of cocaine from destroyed boats. Those seizures are not the abstract talking points of political operatives; they’re the literal drugs that would have flooded our streets had these shipments reached U.S. soil. If the mission keeps fentanyl off our highways and back alleys, then the calculus is straightforward for anyone who puts American lives first.
Yes, international institutions and partisan Democrats have howled, calling for investigations and even invoking terms like “extrajudicial killings,” but their outrage rings hollow when they ignore the decades of cartel violence and the daily devastation of opioid addiction. The U.N. human rights office’s admonitions have been amplified like scripture by sympathetic outlets, yet they rarely reckon with the carnage cartels cause inside our communities. If critics want accountability, fine — but accountability should not become a cover for paralyzing our defense against transnational criminal networks.
The very people now demanding resignations and congressional show trials were mostly silent when drugs poured across the border and communities were destroyed under the last administration. Pentagon briefings and responsible officials have stood behind the legality and necessity of these operations, even as the opposition looks for a way to weaponize every tactical decision into a political scandal. Americans who believe in law and order should support our commanders when they act within the law to defend the republic.
On shows like Megyn Kelly’s, conservative voices like Charles Cooke and Rich Lowry are doing the work the mainstream refuses to do: calling out lazy coverage and insisting on scrutiny that isn’t reflexively anti‑America. That debate matters because it forces the press to choose between honest reporting and partisan theater; so far too many outlets have chosen the theater. The public deserves straight answers, not moral grandstanding designed to tank a policy or a presidency.
Hardworking Americans know what’s at stake: our kids, our neighborhoods, and our sovereignty. If taking the fight to cartels on the high seas means uncomfortable decisions in the short term but fewer overdoses and fewer dead kids in the long term, then conservatives should stand proudly behind those who act to protect the homeland. Let the investigations proceed, but don’t let partisan outrage paralyze the only government that still has the capacity to defend us.
