Staff Reports
Michelle Obama, who once graced our TVs as the First Lady, is now pushing an agenda that divides people based on race. Talk about taking a step back in time! She recently declared her allegiance to buying clothes from designers of color while promoting her latest fashion book. Remember when we used to pick clothes because we liked them, not because of the designer’s skin color? Apparently, that’s no longer enough in the age of racial quotas.
It’s just another example in a long line of liberal hypocrisy. They preach equality and inclusivity yet set rules that divide. It’s funny how they talk down to us about colorblindness, but when it comes to their own lives, they do the opposite. Michelle, didn’t you once say, “When they go low, we go high?” Sounds like she lost her way up in the ivory towers of privilege.
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/2013356579802767412
This is a glaring example of how the left plays identity politics. It’s woven into every fabric of their narrative, just like the new clothes hanging in Obama’s closet. Here we have a former First Lady who should represent all Americans. Instead, she’s wrapped up in a divisive mindset that only sets us further apart. Meanwhile, everyday Americans are working hard, striving for a merit-based country, not one tilted by race or identity politics.
Let’s talk about the silent victims—the designers who don’t fit into Obama’s new ‘criteria’. They’re ignored, not because of their talent or creativity, but because they don’t tick the right boxes on her checklist. It’s puzzling how the progressives applaud this kind of regressive mindset while preaching the gospel of equality and fairness the rest of the time. Clearly, the Globalist narrative and playing identity politics is what get you a standing ovation in those circles.
Isn’t it time we stop playing games with racial labels and start looking at everyone as just American? Putting up walls of skin color never moved society forward. Isn’t it time the liberal elites start practicing what they preach?
