Staff Reports
MSNBC continues to unveil its talent for turning the mundane into the absurd through its relentless obsession with race, particularly when it comes to attacks on GOP rising star JD Vance. The network’s hosts, who seem to operate purely on autopilot with their race-baiting accusations, have demonstrated an alarming ability to resort to such tired tactics without a single thought. While the rest of America moves forward, these pundits are still trapped in a cycle of outrage that hardly seems to excite them anymore.
Interestingly, the absence of Joy Reid from this particular race-inspired frenzy is conspicuous. Known for her enthusiastic color-coded diatribes, Reid has curiously held back on targeting Vance directly. Perhaps it’s because she previously had the sense to sit down with him during the promotion of “Hillbilly Elegy,” managing to have a civil conversation on issues rather than resorting to cheap shots. This moment of zen appears to be a rare exception in a sea of inflammatory rhetoric coming from her colleagues at MSNBC.
That odd time when Joy Reid had JD Vance on her program to discuss in friendly fashion issues of race and class. pic.twitter.com/5sjQPveSoV
— Brad Slager – Scrubbing Down In a Bloodbath (@MartiniShark) July 31, 2024
In a recent episode featuring Molly Jong-Fast, the absurdity reached new heights as the commentator waded into the manufactured controversy surrounding Vance’s comment likening Democrats to “childless cat ladies.” Jong-Fast’s desperate attempt to spin this into a racial issue only backfired when Vance, a proud family man with a wife of Indian descent and three biracial children, stands as a living refutation of her claims. If anything, this highlights the glaring disconnect between the liberal media’s perception of race and reality, underlining how out of touch such commentators really are.
The lack of awareness among these MSNBC hosts is further exemplified by the recent Republican National Convention, where Vance’s wife eloquently addressed the audience. It begs the question: how can self-proclaimed political analysts ignore such glaring evidence when it directly contradicts their narratives? Jong-Fast’s online persona crumbled under the backlash for her misguided commentary, illustrating just how quickly the liberal echo chamber turns on its own when caught off guard.
Meanwhile, the conspiracy machine revved up fully when Rachel Maddow managed to twist Vance’s professional association with a company named after a “Lord of the Rings” reference into some grand claim of white supremacy. The hapless effort involved drawing a ludicrous parallel that claimed businesses associated with Tolkien inevitably veered towards right-wing ideologies. Maddow’s attempt to spin this fantastical yarn into a racial framework shows how far removed from reality these narratives can get. The left’s tendency to hear dog whistles only they can perceive is a well-documented phenomenon, but the degree of stretching seen here defies any semblance of logic.
This pursuit of false narratives is a classic example of how far some media figures will go to manufacture outrage for clicks and views. In the end, the antics at MSNBC almost become comical as they continue to flounder in their attempts to label the right with absurd accusations. It’s a reminder that for many on the left, a narrative devoid of facts is a satisfying way to maintain their grip on the news cycle, even if it means abandoning any semblance of reality in the process.
