admin
On Oct. 7, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi took the Senate Judiciary Committee by storm and showed Senator Adam Schiff exactly how to respond to partisan smears — with facts, firmness, and zero tolerance for the usual Democrat grandstanding. For Americans tired of Washington theater, watching a public servant refuse to be bullied by a career politician was refreshing and necessary. Bondi didn’t apologize for defending law and order, and she refused to be drawn into the circus of insinuations that the left hopes will distract from real accountability.
Schiff spent his time fishing for gotcha moments about the Homan probe, the Epstein files, and past investigations, but Bondi met every bait with a pointed reminder of his own record. She reminded the committee — and the country — that Democrats have a history of weaponizing institutions for political ends, while Schiff himself has been a relentless partisan prosecutor from the House to the Senate. Conservatives saw in that exchange the same pattern we’ve warned about for years: performative outrage, not a genuine desire for justice.
When Democrats demanded that Bondi disclose private consultations and tapes, she declined — rightly — to put ongoing or sensitive investigative matters on a public spectacle. That restraint is what the DOJ should stand for: protecting the integrity of investigations instead of leaking or theatrically broadcasting every fragment for partisan benefit. If Democrats truly cared about transparency they wouldn’t weaponize every document to score headlines; they’d respect proper procedure, which Bondi repeatedly insisted she was following.
The media seized on photos of Bondi’s hearing notes and tried to portray them as some kind of scandal, but the real scandal is the double standard: every tactical move by a Democrat is proclaimed righteous, while every defensive move by a conservative is branded corrupt. Bondi showed she came prepared to expose the hypocrisy and bad faith questioning, and that preparation is exactly what American taxpayers should expect from an AG defending the rule of law. The left’s obsession with theater over substance says far more about them than about her notebook.
This hearing came against a backdrop of legitimate concerns about politicized prosecutions and selective leaks — problems conservatives have warned about for years. Bondi’s refusal to be intimidated, her steady defense of crime-fighting initiatives, and her refusal to let a partisan committee turn oversight into a show trial are reasons to cheer. If we want an America where justice is applied equally and officials aren’t punished for being loyal to the rule of law, we should stand with leaders who will fight those battles openly and unapologetically.
Hardworking Americans should take note: Pam Bondi didn’t fold when pressured by a media-friendly Democrat with a long record of grandstanding. She answered where appropriate, declined where necessary, and pushed back where honesty demanded it — and that’s the kind of backbone Washington desperately needs. Let this hearing be a reminder that patriotism sometimes looks like standing your ground against a corrupt and performative political class.
