Staff Reports
Catherine Rampell found herself in a tizzy recently when discussing the very real possibility of Donald Trump winning the upcoming election and carrying out his immigration plan, which includes deporting individuals who entered the country illegally. On CNN’s “News Night,” while right-wing commentator Scott Jennings laid out the benefits of Trump’s economic and immigration policies, Rampell’s reaction was nothing short of dramatic. Had the cameras been positioned differently, one might have thought she was auditioning for the role of “Triggered Liberal of the Year.”
Jennings was on point when he explained that Trump intends to maintain tax cuts, slash federal regulations thanks to a favorable Supreme Court, and tackle unfair trade practices that undermine American workers. The plan certainly sounds appealing to those who understand that a strong economy follows a strong worker. But kick the topic to immigration, and Rampell, sporting an expression that could curl the ink in a newspaper, was ready to pounce, declaring Jennings wrong and attempting to rain on his parade. Apparently, touting policies that benefit actual citizens is her version of blasphemy.
NEW: Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell gets triggered after CNN's Scott Jennings and Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary shred her over the economy.
Rampell said illegals can't be deported because they need to pick crops.
Rampell: "He's gonna deport 20 million people! The… pic.twitter.com/Iel1T1ad8v
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 17, 2024
Rampell’s alarming assertion that Trump would deport around 20 million people drew significant attention. She seemed far more concerned with the plight of illegal immigrants than the actual American workers who are frequently displaced by unbridled immigration. In her worldview, it seems that individuals who harvest crops, process meat, or care for elderly loved ones are so vital that their potential deportation is comparable to a national crisis. Ironically, however, the argument centers on finding solutions to ensure that those labor needs are met legally and sustainably, unlike Rampell’s alarmist claims.
The juxtaposition of Rampell’s rhetoric with the historical successes of Trump’s policies could not be more striking. When Trump enacted tariffs against countries like China, inflation remained remarkably low, debunking the myth propagated by leftist pundits like Rampell that such measures would sink the economy. It’s almost as if these commentators live in an alternate universe where facts only support their emotional pleas rather than reality. The more they struggle to rationalize their positions, the more absurd their arguments become, making the job of rational observers much easier.
Even as voices lined up to challenge Rampell’s claims, the real kicker in this saga was Trump’s clarification during a town hall meeting. When pressed about the deportation of farm workers, Trump noted that focusing on illegal immigrants is absolutely necessary but emphasized that criminals were the top priority. His goal is not mass deportations for the sake of chaos but rather a return to law and order with a clear pathway for legal immigration. Rampell might realize that this is not the dystopian world she imagines; rather, it is a balanced approach to immigration that protects American interests above all else.
In conclusion, Trump’s plans to crack down on illegal immigration are underscored by the need for safety and legality—principles that are conveniently overlooked by the likes of Rampell. Her perspective epitomizes Trump Derangement Syndrome, which seems to cloud the judgment of those more concerned about defending immigration at all costs than protecting American jobs and security. As more voices in the arena champion straightforward, pragmatic solutions, it’s likely the echoed words of Rampell will serve only as fodder for those seeking a good chuckle at the political circus.
