admin
Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol has endured for nearly two centuries because it names what the left refuses to name: the human heart matters more than any policy paper or government program. That one scene where Scrooge sees the Cratchit family around their meagre table—where Tiny Tim’s bright faith and fragile hope meet Scrooge’s cold indifference—cuts through every modern excuse for moral shirking. Conservatives should celebrate that incision, because it points to an eternal truth: character and community change people, not mandates from on high.
The moment when Scrooge begins to feel for Tiny Tim is not sentimental fluff; it is a moral awakening that comes from seeing real people up close. Fezziwig’s Christmas party and the Cratchit table both show that generosity is most powerful when it is freely given by neighbors, employers, and families, not parceled out by distant bureaucrats. That’s the conservative case for subsidiarity—let the family and the local community carry weight, because they actually know the names and needs of those they serve.
Scrooge’s redemption underlines personal responsibility in a way that modern progressives would rather erase. He is not saved by a government program or a political sermon; he is saved by conscience and the painful choice to change his life. We need more of that message in our culture: men and women who repent, who put others first, and who build institutions of charity out of love, not compulsion.
Too many contemporary institutions preach compassion while hollowing it out, substituting virtue-signalling for sacrifice and paperwork for real neighborly care. The “woke” elites demand money and obedience while moving farther from the kind of face-to-face, sacrificial charity Dickens honored. Conservatives must call out that hypocrisy and hold a high standard: if you preach compassion, you must also open your hands and your home.
There is also a religious core to Dickens’s tale that modern secularists ignore at their peril. The gospel of repentance and renewal runs through Scrooge’s transformation, and his eventual embrace of family, faith, and festivity restores the social glue that makes prosperity meaningful. Preserving churches, civic associations, and fraternal bonds is not nostalgia; it is national security for the soul of America.
This story is a blueprint for rebuilding a healthier civic life: strong families, accountable employers, vibrant churches, and neighbors who look after one another. Conservatives should use Dickens’s example to argue for policies that empower civil society—tax incentives for local charities, school choice that strengthens families, and legal protections for faith-based organizations. The solution to poverty and loneliness is more moral courage and local muscle, not more distant control.
So let us take the lesson to heart this holiday season and every season: a nation that cares begins with citizens who care. Defend tradition, demand real charity, and reject the hollow promises of elites who say they care while destroying the institutions that actually do. If Americans reclaim that spirit, like Scrooge they can be remade—and the country along with them.
