admin
America lost one of its most consequential public servants when former Vice President Dick Cheney died on November 3, 2025, surrounded by family after a long battle with heart and vascular disease. News organizations from coast to coast are parsing a complex life of service that stretched from Capitol Hill to the Pentagon and into the highest reaches of the executive branch. As NEWSMAX’s James Rosen and other conservative outlets remind patriotic Americans, Cheney’s story is not reducible to the cheap caricatures sold by the left.
Cheney remade the vice presidency into a position of real influence at a time when the nation faced its darkest hour after the 9/11 attacks, insisting on robust, decisive action to protect American lives and interests. He was a central architect of the administration’s global response to terrorism — a response that many in Washington then, and too many on the left now, would have had us abandon at our peril. Those who reduce his legacy to two words miss how Republican firmness after 9/11 kept America safe from further catastrophe for years.
Yes, Cheney embraced controversial tools — enhanced interrogation and warrantless surveillance among them — because he believed the survival of our republic required extraordinary measures against an enemy that showed no regard for civilized norms. Conservatives must be honest: in the frantic months after September 11, when the intelligence community and the public feared another strike, Cheney prioritized American lives above legalistic handwringing. He argued then, as he did for decades, that safeguarding Americans sometimes demands hard, unsentimental choices from leaders who understand the stakes.
The Iraq war and the intelligence failures that preceded it remain the thorniest parts of Cheney’s record, and critics on both sides are right to demand accountability for mistakes. But conservatives also know the difference between bad intelligence and bad intent; Cheney pursued a policy he believed would prevent future horrors and liberate a people held by a brutal regime. The scramble to rewrite those decisions into a narrative of simple malice is what the left specializes in, while real patriots acknowledge both the errors and the courage behind the effort.
Beyond any single policy fight, Cheney’s enduring imprint is institutional: he expanded the practical power of the vice presidency and reasserted the primacy of a strong executive when the nation needed clarity and resolve. That insistence on presidential authority was controversial then and remains a flashpoint today, but it stemmed from a worldview forged in the Cold War and refined by bitter experience in the aftermath of terror. Whether you agreed with his methods or not, Cheney believed in the survival of the American experiment and acted as if the cost of failure could not be measured in political convenience.
Cheney’s life was also a human story of resilience — five heart attacks, a heart transplant in 2012, and a fierce devotion to family that never waned despite the political storms. He leaves behind Lynne and their daughters, and a family that often paid the price for a public life lived at full throttle. Conservatives can honor that sacrifice without surrendering legitimate debate about policy; remembrance and critique are both patriotic duties.
As patriotic networks like NEWSMAX revisit Cheney’s record, America gets a chance to remember what strong leadership looks like in a dangerous world: imperfect, resolute, and willing to shoulder the weight of hard decisions. The left will keep trying to brand him a villain, but millions of hardworking Americans understand that defending the homeland is neither tidy nor politically expedient. In the coming weeks the conversation will be fierce — let it be fair, and let it be guided by gratitude for a man who, for all his flaws, stood ready to protect our nation when it mattered most.
