admin
The Pima County sheriff’s office finally put an unambiguous bow on one aspect of the Nancy Guthrie story: Sheriff Chris Nanos announced that Savannah Guthrie’s immediate family — siblings and spouses included — have been cleared as possible suspects and are being treated as victims in this terrifying ordeal. That official clarification should have been delivered sooner, but the county’s clear statement at least ends the grotesque social-media huntress behavior that had descended on a grieving family.
Only days before that firm declaration, Sheriff Nanos was chastising pundits and online sleuths for leaping to conclusions while stopping short of an explicit exoneration; his Daily Mail comments urged caution and condemned the nasty rush to judgment that had turned ordinary citizens into prosecutors on social media. The back-and-forth from law enforcement — caution one day, categorical clearing the next — feeds public distrust and hands ammo to anyone who wants to argue that elites and institutions play by different rules.
The hard facts of the case are grim and undeniable: Nancy Guthrie, 84, vanished from her Tucson-area home after being dropped off at night, surveillance captured a masked individual tampering with door cameras, and investigators recovered a glove with male DNA that does not match family members. Law enforcement has emphasized that the investigation is ongoing, and the presence of unidentified DNA undercuts the rush to pin this on those who loved her.
Conservative voices across the country have every right to demand clarity, but we should be just as ready to call out the media when it behaves like a lynch mob. Megyn Kelly’s blunt reaction — calling the performative certainty of some pundits a lie — resonates because too many outlets substituted gossip for evidence and convenience for restraint. The truth matters more than clicks; when reporters weaponize speculation against private citizens they aren’t doing journalism, they’re doing character assassination.
Still, Americans should demand better than theater from our institutions. If law enforcement is going to change its public posture, it needs to explain why, lay out the evidence it relied on, and show the work that led to the family’s clearance — not hide behind pleas for compassion while allowing obvious inconsistencies to fester. The public can mourn with the Guthries and still insist prosecutors and investigators provide transparent, consistent updates that restore confidence in the process.
Finally, this is not a time for partisan grandstanding or moral preening; it is a time for results. The FBI and local authorities continue to investigate, and there are ongoing efforts to match the unidentified DNA and follow other promising leads — the federal reward and the resources being applied mean this case will not be forgotten until there is accountability. Every hardworking American who respects the rule of law should support a thorough, evidence-driven investigation and reject media-driven rushes to judgment that destroy lives and distract from finding Nancy Guthrie.
