Staff Reports
In a recent wave of attacks on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, leftists are engaging in a form of reverse court-packing. By smearing Thomas and pressuring him to recuse himself from key cases, liberals are attempting to shape the outcome of these cases and control the direction of the nation. These attacks focus on dubious ethical allegations, such as Thomas accepting trips from wealthy friends or receiving gifts. However, Thomas has explained that these actions were within the bounds of the ethics standards at the time. It is worth noting that liberal justices, like Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, have also engaged in similar activities without facing the same level of scrutiny.
The absurd hypocrisy of these attacks is evident. Rep. Bill Pascrell has even gone so far as to call for Thomas’s resignation, while Squad member Rep. Pramila Jayapal accuses him of hypocrisy for accepting gifts from billionaires. However, it’s important to understand that these friends did not have cases before the court and were not parties to any litigation that Thomas was deciding. The left’s claims that Thomas violated ethics rules are baseless and unfounded.
ICYMI: Clarence Thomas Smears Are About Reverse Court-Packing, Forcing Conservative Justices Off Key Caseshttps://t.co/TjCYhvSyWt
— JCN (@judicialnetwork) August 15, 2023
So why the targeted attacks on Thomas? It’s clear that the left has been obsessed with him since his nomination to the Supreme Court in 1991. The reality is that Thomas is a staunch originalist who has consistently interpreted the Constitution based on its original meaning. This commitment to the rule of law and limited government frightens the left, who would prefer judges who are willing to legislate from the bench and impose their own policy preferences.
Moreover, the left’s attempts to force recusals and undermine conservative justices is unconstitutional and a direct attack on the independence of the judiciary. Congress has no authority to control a separate and coequal branch of government. The Supreme Court has its own ethical standards, and there is no evidence that Thomas violated any of these standards. The left’s desperation to neutralize Thomas and shape the court’s decisions is a dangerous and undemocratic ploy.
The American people have consistently rejected court-packing and attempts to undermine the judiciary’s independence. These attacks on Thomas should be dismissed for what they are: a power grab by the left to control the court and subvert the will of the American people. The Constitution enshrines the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances, and it’s crucial that we defend these principles against the left’s assault.
