Staff Reports
The article discusses the controversy surrounding House Speaker Mike Johnson’s attempt to limit spending bills to a single issue. Democrats are outraged by Johnson’s approach, which aims to ensure that aid to Israel is covered by offsetting the spending with cuts to the IRS. The article points out that Johnson is not taking funding that has been used for years, but rather cutting new spending that was being sent via the “Inflation Reduction Act.”
Democrats Outraged as, God Forbid, Speaker Mike Johnson Tries to Limit Spending Bills to a Single Issuehttps://t.co/zBExUcZbWr
— RedState (@RedState) November 1, 2023
The article includes various critics questioning Johnson’s strategy, but the writer defends Johnson’s decision to ensure the money is available before giving it away. The article highlights the confusion and frustration of Democrats and the conventional wisdom crowd who want to pass multiple bills without considering offsets. The writer argues that it is not a bad idea to have the money available before giving it to someone and criticizes the “degenerate spenders in government” who want to spend recklessly.
The article also mentions the Democratic frustration with Johnson’s decision to cut IRS funding, which they argue will prevent the government from holding wealthy tax cheats accountable and add to the deficit. The writer dismisses this argument and defends Johnson’s decision as a way to stick to one issue per bill and ensure responsible fiscal governance. The writer also criticizes Democrats for their role in pushing for massive spending bills and overthrowing the previous Speaker, which ultimately led to Johnson’s appointment.
Overall, the article takes a favorable view of Speaker Mike Johnson’s attempt to limit spending bills to a single issue and criticizes Democrats for their outrage and lack of fiscal responsibility. The writer defends Johnson’s approach and argues that it is necessary to ensure that the money being spent actually exists and to avoid adding more debt.
