Staff Reports
Stephen Miller recently showcased his command of the facts during a tense exchange with CNN’s Kasie Hunt over the Trump administration’s decisive action to deport members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Utilizing the Alien Enemies Act, the administration successfully removed over 200 gang members from American soil, sending them to El Salvador, where they would be held accountable for their crimes. Hunt attempted to paint the administration’s actions as unlawful and indicative of a broader pattern of disregarding judicial authority, only to find herself outmatched by Miller’s legal and constitutional defenses.
As the conversation unfolded, it became clear that Hunt was struggling to grasp the nuances of the law. Her line of questioning suggested a belief that the administration was wilfully flouting a legitimate court order regarding these deportations. However, Miller emphatically countered that the Alien Enemies Act, established by our Founding Fathers, empowers the president to act decisively against threats to national security—a point that should resonate deeply with all Americans concerned about the integrity of their borders and safety.
The core of Miller’s argument rested on the president’s constitutional authority to protect the nation. He explained that the courts have no jurisdiction over immigration enforcement decisions made under this Act. Citing Article 2 powers, Miller pointed out that the administration’s actions were not only lawful but unavoidable in the face of tangible threats posed by foreign gangs operating within U.S. territory. When pressed by Hunt about the need for a declared war, Miller effectively dismantled her argument by clarifying the conditions under which the Alien Enemies Act can be invoked, which does not rely on a formal declaration of war.
https://t.co/ORCzj8uJwg
The Trump administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport over 200 members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, taking them to El Salvador. This action has drawn criticism, particularly from CNN's Kasie Hunt, who questioned the legality of…— The America One News (@am1_news) March 18, 2025
Hunt’s insistence that these deportations required the oversight of a district court judge reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the balance between judicial oversight and executive power, especially during crises involving national security. Miller made it abundantly clear that allowing a single district court to dictate immigration enforcement would lead to chaos, putting the nation’s sovereignty at risk. The sovereignty of a nation cannot hinge on endless legal wrangling when dealing with those who would threaten its safety.
The administration’s legal strategy involving the deportation of these gang members is not just about removing threats; it is a crucial step in restoring order and security. With President Trump at the helm, significant strides have been made to secure the border and curb illegal immigration, all without the need for new, burdensome legislation. The radical left may spin tales of chaos and lawlessness, but the truth is clear: strong leadership and decisive action are what protect American lives and uphold the rule of law.
As the Biden administration continues to flounder on border security, Trump’s policies serve as a stark reminder of what effective governance looks like. The conservative approach to immigration not only prioritizes public safety but also reinforces the core principles of American sovereignty. In a world where threats abound, there can be no room for hesitation or legal ambivalence when it comes to defending the homeland from those who mean to do harm.
