Staff Reports
A Texas prosecutor is trying to take away a pardon given to Army veteran Daniel Perry, who shot a protester during a riot in July 2020. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott pardoned Perry in May, but Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza wants the pardon rescinded. Garza, who received donations from groups linked to left-wing billionaire George Soros, believes the pardon goes against the law and justice.
Perry shot and killed Garrett Foster, who was carrying a rifle during the riot in Austin. Abbott’s decision to pardon Perry has faced criticism from Garza, who accuses the governor of intervening in the case. However, Abbott has made it clear that he stands by his decision and will not change it.
NOT
GONNA
HAPPENThe Texas Constitution provides: In all criminal cases, the Governor shall have power, after conviction, on the written signed recommendation and advice of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, to grant pardons.https://t.co/xgXY9tWQd7
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) June 5, 2024
The Justice Department has been urged by Democratic state attorneys to investigate Perry’s actions in the shooting. This news has sparked a debate on the role of pardons and the power of governors in the legal system. Some believe that Perry acted in self-defense, while others argue that justice should be served differently.
It is important to remember that pardons are a part of the legal system, and governors have the power to grant them. In this case, Gov. Abbott used his authority to pardon Daniel Perry, which has caused controversy. It is essential to respect the legal process and the decisions made within it, even if they are not always popular.
Editorial: The attempt to rescind Daniel Perry’s pardon highlights the ongoing political divide in our country. It is crucial to uphold the rule of law and not let political motivations cloud judgments. Gov. Abbott’s decision to stand by his pardon shows a commitment to justice and fairness, regardless of outside pressures.
