Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state agencies to ignore a new rule from President Biden’s administration concerning Title IX, a law that prohibits sex discrimination in education. Governor Abbott called the rule an “illegal dictate” and instructed the Texas Education Agency to disregard it.
The rule, announced on April 19, would require schools to recognize a student’s self-declared gender identity, regardless of their biological sex. Governor Abbott wrote a letter to President Biden, criticizing the rule as an attempt to force schools to treat boys as girls. He believes that the administration is overstepping its authority and imposing leftist beliefs on Title IX.
Governor Abbott’s actions are part of a larger effort by several states to challenge the rule. Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, and Idaho have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, while Texas and four other states, along with advocacy groups, have also taken legal action.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall expressed concern that the new rule could lead to the federal government withholding funds from schools that do not comply. He accused President Biden of trying to impose radical gender ideology on states, despite their objections.
Critics of the rule argue that it blurs the distinction between men and women, undermining the original purpose of Title IX, which was to provide equal opportunities for women. They believe that the Biden administration’s changes are discriminatory and go against the law’s intent.
In response to the backlash, a spokesperson for the U.S. Education Department defended the rule, stating that it is meant to ensure that no person experiences sex discrimination in federally funded education. The rule is set to take effect on August 1, despite facing significant opposition from conservative groups and several states.
The ongoing legal challenges and resistance from conservative leaders indicate that the debate over Title IX and gender identity is far from over. Governor Abbott’s decision to defy the Biden administration’s rule reflects a broader conservative pushback against perceived federal overreach in the realm of education and gender policy.