admin
Americans packed State Farm Stadium and overflow venues to honor Charlie Kirk after the shocking murder that stunned the nation, turning grief into a powerful public outpouring for a man who built a movement of young patriots. Tens of thousands of mourners — many describing the service as part memorial, part revival — gathered to remember his life and legacy. The scale and solemnity of the event made clear that Charlie’s voice mattered to a generation that cherishes faith, free speech, and American exceptionalism.
Former President Donald Trump and other conservative leaders spoke at the service, and the tone was unabashedly Christian and resolute, reflecting what Kirk stood for: faith, family, and civic courage. Erika Kirk’s message of forgiveness and speakers’ references to scripture were not accidental; they were central to the mourning and the movement that Charlie inspired. To patriots who watched, this was a unifying moment of faith and resolve, not the sinister spectacle some on the left are portraying.
Enter Don Lemon, who used his platform to condemn what he called “religious nationalism” and accused the memorial of being a political rally dressed as church, arguing that speakers were “claiming divine permission to rule.” His take treats public expressions of faith as an automatic threat rather than the lifeblood of millions of Americans who see their religion as inseparable from their civic identity. Lemon’s lecture about the proper place of faith reeks of the same coastal condescension that tells hardworking citizens to keep their beliefs private while elites weaponize their own ideologies.
Let’s be blunt: calling grief and worship “domination” is contempt for the millions who find solace, purpose, and moral clarity in their faith. Conservatives do not worship politicians; we honor leaders who reflect our values and who affirm the founding principles that grew from a Judeo-Christian moral framework. To dismiss that as dangerous “nationalism” is to misunderstand American history and to insult a grieving nation.
The real hypocrisy here is selective outrage — when conservative crowds pray, it’s “religious nationalism,” but when radical civic movements weaponize identity or crush dissent, those same commentators look the other way. The left’s media elite have no monopoly on patriotism or public faith, and their tantrums about visible Christianity only reveal their desire to silence opposition. Americans deserve leaders and commentators who respect faith’s role in public life, not smug admonishments from sheltered pundits.
Charlie Kirk’s memorial was never a mandate for coercion; it was a testament to a life spent rallying young Americans to stand for what is true and good. If critics like Don Lemon want to lecture the country about the dangers of faith in public, they should first explain why the left’s secular certainties are immune from the same scrutiny. The grieving and the faithful at that stadium showed more courage and unity in a single afternoon than many cable judges do in a year of sanctimonious broadcasts.
