admin
Matt Walsh’s simple question — why are statues so ugly nowadays — landed at the right time because the latest example is impossible to ignore: a ten-foot bronze of Tina Turner unveiled in Brownsville, Tennessee, that has been met with immediate ridicule and disappointment from the public. Locals and fans expected a dignified tribute to a music legend; instead they were handed a clumsy likeness that went viral for all the wrong reasons, proving Walsh’s point that something rotten has taken hold in our public art.
This isn’t an isolated fluke but part of a broader trend where supposedly “public” art ranges from uninspired to deliberately provocative, and where taxpayer money and corporate donations are funneled into projects that insult common taste. Critics online compared the new Turner memorial to cheap caricature more than a respectful statue, and the backlash follows a history of celebrity and civic monuments that missed the mark in sensational fashion.
Matt Walsh has been calling out this uglification for years, arguing that there is a coordinated shift away from craftsmanship and beauty toward art that returns a sneer at tradition and common sense. He and other conservatives see this as aesthetic vandalism dressed up as social progress — an attempt to replace the public’s sense of beauty and history with an intentionally hollow, politicized design language that confuses and alienates ordinary Americans.
You’ve seen the tweets and the stinging quips: conservative voices point out that cities ripped down statues of real heroes only to fill those plazas with grotesqueries that celebrate ideology over excellence. Critics on the right say this is not accidental but ideological: when you pit performative identity politics against time-honored standards of art, the result is ugliness masquerading as moral virtue.
This isn’t merely about bad taste. America has a long list of public monuments that were properly honored or respectfully critiqued, and then replaced in a scramble that left ugliness and inconsistency in its wake — even monuments that became notorious for being “bad” have been removed because they were a blight, not because some bureaucrat had a new vision. The removal and mishandling of controversial statues over the past decade shows how quickly responsibility and reverence can be discarded for the sake of a narrative.
Conservatives should be furious — not at art itself, but at the elites and activists who weaponize culture and public money to erase aesthetic standards and communal memory. This is about stewardship: our towns and public spaces deserve monuments that reflect real skill, durable values, and pride, not the latest activist fad or an inside-the-Beltway stunt that makes locals look foolish.
If Americans care about beauty, history, and civic pride, we need to demand transparency on funding, real qualifications for public commissions, and community input before any more of these debacles are installed. Vote with your dollars and your ballots; insist that the people who decide what stands in your town square actually care about the ordinary citizen’s sense of honor and taste.
