Staff ReportsPresident-elect Donald Trump is making waves with his latest appointment to the Federal Communications Commission. Enter Brendan Carr, the selected candidate to lead the FCC, who seems to have identified the practice of censorship as a major political adversary. His first target? NewsGuard, the self-proclaimed media watchdog that has made a sport out of demonizing conservative media outlets and branding them as purveyors of “misinformation.”
Carr’s move is as bold as it is welcomed by those fed up with the Big Tech oligopoly. In a letter to tech giants like Meta, Apple, Microsoft, and Google, he has called for transparency regarding their partnership with NewsGuard. Carr threatens to revoke the legal immunity these companies cling to under Section 230 if they don’t come clean about how they are weaponizing this so-called fact-checking service to suppress conservative voices. It’s a classic case of “don’t mess with the bull, or you’ll get the horns.”
Trump’s pick to head FCC Brendan Carr plans crackdown on ‘unprecedented surge’ in censorship by Big Techhttps://t.co/EC3wsZZmHh pic.twitter.com/6y44jOfp1F
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) November 20, 2024
The media-monitoring firm has gotten a deserved reputation for its questionable grading system, which seemingly rates conservative outlets lower while propping up mainstream media narratives. For instance, it bestowed high ratings on content that parrots the government line on COVID-19 vaccines while disregarding outlets that dared to discuss the lab leak theory. All this raises eyebrows and questions about who gets to determine the “truth” in today’s digital marketplace.
Carr believes that Big Tech has formed a “censorship cartel,” working alongside NewsGuard and other dubious organizations to implement economic fallacies that harm certain news sources. He is not shy about holding them accountable for this conduct. The vast influence held by companies like Facebook, Google, and Apple and their partnership with NewGuard could soon find them facing real repercussions if Carr has his way. Some see this as the dawn of a new era in which accountability reigns over unchecked digital power.
While the mainstream media rushed to defend NewsGuard’s credibility, it appears that their grip on the narrative is tightening, and it’s about time that someone in government is willing to call it out. Carr’s vigorous stance to redefine Section 230 shows that the days of letting Big Tech call all the shots could be numbered. As the narrative around First Amendment rights continues to bubble, patriots are hopeful that Carr will lead the charge toward restoring free speech for all, not just those who align with the leftist agenda.
With this appointment, Trump has signaled that he’s still in it to win it when it comes to fighting for free speech. The implications of Carr’s leadership in the FCC will be felt far and wide in the world of media. If Carr’s fight against censorship and misinformation goes as planned, Americans could soon experience a breath of fresh air away from the stifling grip of biased media.
