Staff Reports
In a shocking twist that seems too absurd to be true, it appears that the Trump administration still faces an uphill battle against a legal system that favors criminals over patriots. A recent situation illustrates just how far the judicial system has strayed from the original design of our government, as President Trump took decisive action to deport Venezuelan gang members, only to be thwarted—at least temporarily—by an overzealous federal judge.
According to reports, a small internal squad within the Trump administration, led by the ever-astute Stephen Miller and the indefatigable Kristi Noem, managed to get rid of about 250 members of the Tren de Aragua gang before Judge James Boasberg could intervene. In a move reminiscent of a well-orchestrated heist but with far better intent, Trump signed an executive order invoking the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, demonstrating a willingness to take a stand against open-border fanatics and crime-ridden chaos. Somehow, upon hearing about these swift deportations, Judge Boasberg imagined he had the authority to stop them mid-flight. Spoiler alert: those planes were already far beyond his reach.
The absurdity of the legal landscape in America today becomes clearer when one considers the historical context of the Alien Enemies Act. This act, signed by President John Adams in a time when America faced threats from revolutionary France, authorized the deportation of foreign nationals deemed dangerous. Critics today may roll their eyes at the invocation of an antiquated law, but the truth is that it fits perfectly into a modern-day scenario, where the Biden administration turned the borders into a welcome mat for criminals. The irony is rich; Jefferson and Madison once considered this kind of action tyrannical—only now it seems more necessary than ever.
White House Official's Quick Move Thwarts Obama-Appointed Judge's Attempt to Halt Deportation of Illegal Gangsters via @WestJournalism https://t.co/qbOBI39Ewd
Judge James Boasberg is the worst. He clearly hates US citizens and doesn't have a clue how to be a fair judge— Dr johnnieB (@BoudinotJohn) March 17, 2025
Moving into the courtroom, the Hubris of Judge Boasberg knows no bounds. He outwardly demanded that any aircraft in transit should be turned around, as if he had the authority to commandeer the skies. His desire for more time to deliberate on Trump’s executive actions only exposes the judiciary’s blatant overreach. Meanwhile, Trump’s team seems to have surrendered a bit too easily to this judge’s audacious antics, choosing to engage in a public relations battle instead of a principled stand against judicial overreach. Somehow, being on the side of deporting rapists and murderers should be less about optics for them and more about constitutional authority.
The bigger question looming in this saga is why the Trump administration feels compelled to appeal to the Supreme Court to validate its authority. The Constitution clearly delineates powers, yet here we are, with the executive branch looking to the judiciary to affirm a power that should be beyond dispute. Rather than submitting to a system that has clearly overstepped its bounds, the administration should assert its prerogatives and protect the nation from external threats—especially when former President Biden has all but handed the keys to the kingdom to criminals crossing our borders.
Despite the internal dilemmas, the narrative offers a clear victory in the court of public opinion. The idea that Democrats would prefer to see these criminals remain on U.S. soil makes their opaqueness on border security painfully obvious. Trump’s actions, however unorthodox, resonate with Americans who yearn for a government that puts citizens first instead of courting miscreants. The Supreme Court may yet provide a lifeline, but the emphasis should firmly remain on the Constitution’s authority over the judicial whimsy currently running amok. Perhaps, somewhere in the chaotic landscape of American governance, the principles of republicanism can be revived, but that requires a bold stand against a judicial system that has long since forgotten its place.
